Literature DB >> 10564401

Initiating research with doubly vulnerable populations.

L W Moore1, M Miller.   

Abstract

Some research questions can only be answered by members of a vulnerable group. Frequently members of these groups are doubly vulnerable as they experience more than one factor that diminishes their autonomy. Initiating research with doubly vulnerable persons presents unique and often difficult challenges. Because of these challenges, many researchers purposefully exclude doubly vulnerable groups from research endeavours. Thus, the health care needs and concerns of individuals considered doubly vulnerable are often not addressed in the scientific literature. This article presents two challenges frequently encountered when initiating research with doubly vulnerable populations: resolving pre-investigation issues and gaining access to vulnerable populations. Ethically sound strategies for confronting these challenges are discussed. Researchers' experiences with doubly vulnerable populations are also incorporated. Only when doubly vulnerable groups receive the appropriate research attention are the standards of their care and their quality of life enhanced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10564401     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01205.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  7 in total

1.  An Ethical Justification for Expanding the Notion of Effectiveness in Vaccine Post-Market Monitoring: Insights from the HPV Vaccine in Canada.

Authors:  Ana Komparic; Maxwell J Smith; Alison Thompson
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 1.940

2.  Strategies to engage clinical staff in subject recruitment.

Authors:  Lisa S Segre; Kathleen C Buckwalter; Marie-Luise Friedemann
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 3.  Ethics of pharmacological research involving adolescents.

Authors:  Eva Welisch; Luis A Altamirano-Diaz
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  Ethical issues in research involving victims of terror.

Authors:  Alan R Fleischman; Emily B Wood
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  Learning from Interviews with HIV-Discordant Couples (Male Positive, Female Negative): The Challenges and Successes.

Authors:  Sandy N Tecimer; Denise Jaworsky; Trent Newmeyer; Steven Chihrin; Kevin Gough; Anita Rachlis; James Martin; Saira Mohammed; Mona R Loutfy
Journal:  Open AIDS J       Date:  2011-03-31

6.  Photo-elicitation with adolescents in qualitative research: an example of its use in exploring family interactions in adolescent psychiatry.

Authors:  J Sibeoni; E Costa-Drolon; L Poulmarc'h; S Colin; M Valentin; J Pradère; A Revah-Levy
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 7.  Agile Application of Digital Health Interventions during the COVID-19 Refugee Response.

Authors:  Nirmala P Narla; Aral Surmeli; Sean M Kivlehan
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.462

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.