Literature DB >> 21867585

Quality of information available on the World Wide Web for patients undergoing thyroidectomy: review.

S Muthukumarasamy1, Z Osmani, A Sharpe, R J A England.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the quality of information available on the World Wide Web for patients undergoing thyroidectomy.
METHODS: The first 50 web-links generated by internet searches using the five most popular search engines and the key word 'thyroidectomy' were evaluated using the Lida website validation instrument (assessing accessibility, usability and reliability) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score.
RESULTS: We evaluated 103 of a possible 250 websites. Mean scores (ranges) were: Lida accessibility, 48/63 (27-59); Lida usability, 36/54 (21-50); Lida reliability, 21/51 (4-38); and Flesch Reading Ease, 43.9 (2.6-77.6).
CONCLUSION: The quality of internet health information regarding thyroidectomy is variable. High ranking and popularity are not good indicators of website quality. Overall, none of the websites assessed achieved high Lida scores. In order to prevent the dissemination of inaccurate or commercially motivated information, we recommend independent labelling of medical information available on the World Wide Web.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21867585     DOI: 10.1017/S0022215111002246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  8 in total

1.  Urologists in cyberspace: A review of the quality of health information from American urologists' websites using three validated tools.

Authors:  Lih-Ming Wong; Hanmu Yan; David Margel; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Consulting Dr. Google: Quality of Online Resources About Tympanostomy Tube Placement.

Authors:  Vandra C Harris; Anne R Links; Paul Hong; Jonathan Walsh; Desi P Schoo; David E Tunkel; Charles M Stewart; Emily F Boss
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Indian endocrine surgery websites are they comparable?

Authors:  Vnssvams Mahalakshmi D; Mayilvaganan Sabaretnam; Dabeer Warsi; P R K Bhargav; Aromal Chekavar; Amit Agarwal
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-18

4.  Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Jan-Henning Wölm; Stefan Vallo; Rene Mager; Johannes Huber; Johannes Breyer; Johannes Salem; Stacy Loeb; Axel Haferkamp; Igor Tsaur
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Christos Livas; Konstantina Delli; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Julie M Robillard; Judy Illes; Marcel Arcand; B Lynn Beattie; Sherri Hayden; Peter Lawrence; Joanna McGrenere; Peter B Reiner; Dana Wittenberg; Claudia Jacova
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-07-02

7.  Evaluation of internet derived patient information.

Authors:  J B M Ward; P Leach
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  German dentists' websites on periodontitis have low quality of information.

Authors:  Falk Schwendicke; Jörg Stange; Claudia Stange; Christian Graetz
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.