Literature DB >> 21865322

Combinatorial activation and concentration-dependent repression of the Drosophila even skipped stripe 3+7 enhancer.

Paolo Struffi1, Maria Corado, Leah Kaplan, Danyang Yu, Christine Rushlow, Stephen Small.   

Abstract

Despite years of study, the precise mechanisms that control position-specific gene expression during development are not understood. Here, we analyze an enhancer element from the even skipped (eve) gene, which activates and positions two stripes of expression (stripes 3 and 7) in blastoderm stage Drosophila embryos. Previous genetic studies showed that the JAK-STAT pathway is required for full activation of the enhancer, whereas the gap genes hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni) are required for placement of the boundaries of both stripes. We show that the maternal zinc-finger protein Zelda (Zld) is absolutely required for activation, and present evidence that Zld binds to multiple non-canonical sites. We also use a combination of in vitro binding experiments and bioinformatics analysis to redefine the Kni-binding motif, and mutational analysis and in vivo tests to show that Kni and Hb are dedicated repressors that function by direct DNA binding. These experiments significantly extend our understanding of how the eve enhancer integrates positive and negative transcriptional activities to generate sharp boundaries in the early embryo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21865322      PMCID: PMC3171227          DOI: 10.1242/dev.065987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  37 in total

1.  The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  J Jiang; D Kosman; Y T Ip; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Transcriptional repression of eukaryotic promoters.

Authors:  M Levine; J L Manley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Abdominal segmentation of the Drosophila embryo requires a hormone receptor-like protein encoded by the gap gene knirps.

Authors:  U Nauber; M J Pankratz; A Kienlin; E Seifert; U Klemm; H Jäckle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Spacing ensures autonomous expression of different stripe enhancers in the even-skipped promoter.

Authors:  S Small; D N Arnosti; M Levine
Journal:  Development       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Sequence-specific DNA-binding activities of the gap proteins encoded by hunchback and Krüppel in Drosophila.

Authors:  D Stanojević; T Hoey; M Levine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Solubilization and purification of enzymatically active glutathione S-transferase (pGEX) fusion proteins.

Authors:  J V Frangioni; B G Neel
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Nanos is the localized posterior determinant in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Wang; R Lehmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-08-23       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila.

Authors:  K Harding; T Hoey; R Warrior; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Regulation of even-skipped stripe 2 in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  S Small; A Blair; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  29 in total

1.  HOT DNAs: a novel class of developmental enhancers.

Authors:  Emma Farley; Michael Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A sequence level model of an intact locus predicts the location and function of nonadditive enhancers.

Authors:  Kenneth A Barr; John Reinitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Systems biophysics of gene expression.

Authors:  Jose M G Vilar; Leonor Saiz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Quantitative analysis reveals genotype- and domain- specific differences between mRNA and protein expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Svetlana Surkova; Alena Sokolkova; Konstantin Kozlov; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Maria Samsonova
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Synthetic enhancer design by in silico compensatory evolution reveals flexibility and constraint in cis-regulation.

Authors:  Kenneth A Barr; Carlos Martinez; Jennifer R Moran; Ah-Ram Kim; Alexandre F Ramos; John Reinitz
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2017-11-29

6.  Shadow enhancers enable Hunchback bifunctionality in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Max V Staller; Ben J Vincent; Meghan D J Bragdon; Tara Lydiard-Martin; Zeba Wunderlich; Javier Estrada; Angela H DePace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sequence-based model of gap gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Konstantin Kozlov; Vitaly Gursky; Ivan Kulakovskiy; Maria Samsonova
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control.

Authors:  François Spitz; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Su(H)-mediated repression positions gene boundaries along the dorsal-ventral axis of Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Anil Ozdemir; Lijia Ma; Kevin P White; Angelike Stathopoulos
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 12.270

10.  The TAGteam motif facilitates binding of 21 sequence-specific transcription factors in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Rahul Satija; Robert K Bradley
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.