Literature DB >> 21863364

Mammography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines.

Nicole Shen1, Linda Sue Hammonds, Dick Madsen, Paul Dale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This 10-year retrospective chart review evaluates the potential impact the most recent U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) report recommending against annual mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years.
METHODS: The medical record database was systematically searched to discover all women aged 40-49 years treated for breast cancer over a 10-year period. These women were separated into 2 cohorts-mammographically detected cancer (MDC) and nonmammographically detected cancer (NMDC). Statistical analysis of the cohorts was performed for family history (FH), sentinel lymph node (SLN) status, tumor size at presentation, and disease-free and overall survival.
RESULTS: A total of 1581 women were treated for breast cancer; of these, 311 were between the ages of 40 and 49 years with complete diagnostic information, 145 were MDC, and 166 were NMDC. The average tumor diameter of the MDC group was 20.68 mm, which was significantly smaller than that of the NMDC group at 30.38 mm (P < .0001). Women with MDC had a significantly lower incidence of SLN positive cancer than the NMDC group, 28 of 113 (24.78%) vs. 85 of 152 (55.92%; P < .0001), respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival for both groups was MDC 94% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 87-97%) and NMDC 71% (95% CI 62-78%). The overall 5-year survival estimates were MDC 97% (95% CI 92-99%) and NMDC 78% (95% CI 69-85%), respectively.
CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates the significance of mammographic screening for early detection and treatment of breast cancer. Mammographic screening in women aged 40-49 detected smaller tumors with less nodal metastasis, resulting in improved survival, which supports annual mammographic screening in this age group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21863364     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2009-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  Are obese women more likely to participate in a mobile mammography program?

Authors:  Elvonna Atkins; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Ami Vyas; Sara Jane Gainor; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-04

Review 2.  The Landmark Series-Addressing Disparities in Breast Cancer Screening: New Recommendations for Black Women.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Christine E Edmonds; Sylvia A Reyes; Cletus Arciero; Vivian J Bea; Angelena Crown; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.339

3.  Incidence and time trends of brain metastases admissions among breast cancer patients in Sweden.

Authors:  G Frisk; T Svensson; L M Bäcklund; E Lidbrink; P Blomqvist; K E Smedby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Screening mammography with special reference to guidelines in South Africa.

Authors:  Shirley Lipschitz
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.