Literature DB >> 21863261

Preserved grip selection planning in chronic unilateral upper extremity amputees.

Benjamin A Philip1, Scott H Frey.   

Abstract

Upper limb amputees receive no proprioceptive or visual sensory feedback about their absent hand. In this study, we asked whether chronic amputees nevertheless retain the ability to accurately plan gripping movements. Fourteen patients and matched controls performed two grip selection tasks: overt grip selection (OGS), in which they used their intact hand to grasp an object that appeared in different orientations using the most natural (under- or overhand) precision grip, and prospective grip selection (PGS), in which they selected the most natural grip for either hand without moving. We evaluated planning accuracy by comparing concordance between grip preferences expressed in PGS vs. OGS for the intact hand and PGS vs. the inverse of OGS responses for the affected hand. Overall, amputees showed no deficits in the accuracy of grip selection planning based on either hand and a consistent preference for less awkward hand postures. We found no evidence for a speed-accuracy tradeoff. Furthermore, selection accuracy did not depend on phantom mobility, phantom limb pain, time since amputation, or the residual limb's shoulder posture. Our findings demonstrate that unilateral upper limb amputees retain the ability to plan movements based on the biomechanics of their affected hand even many years after limb loss. This unimpaired representation may stem from persistent higher-level activity-independent internal representations or may be sustained by sensory feedback from the intact hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21863261      PMCID: PMC4978427          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2842-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  44 in total

1.  Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain?

Authors:  M Lotze; W Grodd; N Birbaumer; M Erb; E Huse; H Flor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements.

Authors:  Christopher A Buneo; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Posture influences motor imagery: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Floris P de Lange; Rick C Helmich; Ivan Toni
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Imagining the impossible: motor representations in anosognosia for hemiplegia.

Authors:  Paul M Jenkinson; Nicola M J Edelstyn; Simon J Ellis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

Authors:  T W Wright; A D Hagen; M B Wood
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Activity in the human primary motor cortex related to ipsilateral hand movements.

Authors:  R Kawashima; P E Roland; B T O'Sullivan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-11-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Evidence for context sensitivity of grasp representations in human parietal and premotor cortices.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Stéphane Jacobs; Scott H Frey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Maintaining internal representations: the role of the human superior parietal lobe.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; S J Goodbody; M Husain
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  The moving phantom: motor execution or motor imagery?

Authors:  Estelle Raffin; Pascal Giraux; Karen T Reilly
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Rapid reorganization of adult rat motor cortex somatic representation patterns after motor nerve injury.

Authors:  J N Sanes; S Suner; J F Lando; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Stimulus-response correspondence across peripersonal space is unaffected by chronic unilateral limb loss.

Authors:  Benjamin A Philip; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Internal models of upper limb prosthesis users when grasping and lifting a fragile object with their prosthetic limb.

Authors:  Peter S Lum; Iian Black; Rahsaan J Holley; Jessica Barth; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differences in AMPA and GABAA/B receptor subunit expression between the chronically reorganized cortex and brainstem of adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  Todd M Mowery; Rohini M Sarin; Polina V Kostylev; Preston E Garraghty
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Maturation and experience in action representation: Bilateral deficits in unilateral congenital amelia.

Authors:  B A Philip; C Buckon; S Sienko; M Aiona; S Ross; S H Frey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Neurorehabilitation in upper limb amputation: understanding how neurophysiological changes can affect functional rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 4.262

6.  Characteristics of phantom upper limb mobility encourage phantom-mobility-based prosthesis control.

Authors:  Amélie Touillet; Laetitia Peultier-Celli; Caroline Nicol; Nathanaël Jarrassé; Isabelle Loiret; Noël Martinet; Jean Paysant; Jozina B De Graaf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Motor control drives visual bodily judgements.

Authors:  Roni O Maimon-Mor; Hunter R Schone; Rani Moran; Peter Brugger; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-01-13

8.  Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use.

Authors:  Roni O Maimon-Mor; Hunter R Schone; David Henderson Slater; A Aldo Faisal; Tamar R Makin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.