Literature DB >> 21862683

Impact of KRAS mutations on clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients treated with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.

Seung Tae Kim1, Do Hyoung Lim, Kee-Taek Jang, Taekyu Lim, Jeeyun Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Hye-Lim Jang, Jun Ho Yi, Kyung Kee Baek, Se Hoon Park, Young Suk Park, Ho Yeong Lim, Won Ki Kang, Joon Oh Park.   

Abstract

Although erlotinib has become an important therapeutic option in addition to gemcitabine, the high frequency of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer probably limits the benefits. We retrospectively studied 136 pancreatic cancer patients with available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 2003 to 2009 to understand the clinical significance of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. KRAS mutations were analyzed by sequencing codons 12, 13, and 61. In this study, 71 (52.2%) of the 136 pancreatic adenocarcinomas examined harbored a point mutation in codons 12 (n = 70) and 61 (n = 1) of KRAS. KRAS mutation was not associated with clinicopathologic parameters. Patients with KRAS mutations showed a worse response (11.3%) than those with wild-type KRAS (26.2%) and poor survival (mutant KRAS, 5.8 months vs. wild-type KRAS, 8.0 months; P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed good prognostic factors for overall survival as well to moderately differentiated histology (P < 0.001; HR = 0.437, 95% CI: 0.301-0.634), locally advanced disease (P < 0.001; HR = 0.417, 95% CI: 0.255-0.681), response to first-line chemotherapy (P = 0.003; HR = 0.482, 95% CI: 0.297-0.780), and wild-type KRAS (P = 0.001; HR = 0.523, 95% CI: 0.355-0.770). However, the observed survival advantage is derived from the subgroup of patients treated with gemcitabine/erlotinib (9.7 vs. 5.2 months; P = 0.002), whereas no survival difference based on KRAS mutation status is obvious in the other subgroup of patients treated without erlotinib (7.0 vs. 7.0 months; P = 0.121). These results need to be further explored in upcoming prospective studies to provide a rationale for personalized medicine in pancreatic cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862683     DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther        ISSN: 1535-7163            Impact factor:   6.261


  67 in total

1.  Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104).

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Erika Kettner; Angela Märten; Cornelia Winkelmann; Stefan Klein; Georgi Kojouharoff; Thomas C Gauler; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Michael R Clemens; Michael Geissler; Tim F Greten; Susanna Hegewisch-Becker; Oleg Rubanov; Gerold Baake; Thomas Höhler; Yon D Ko; Andreas Jung; Sascha Neugebauer; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Translational research in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current evidence and future concepts.

Authors:  Stephan Kruger; Michael Haas; Steffen Ormanns; Sibylle Bächmann; Jens T Siveke; Thomas Kirchner; Volker Heinemann; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  KRAS mutation status is not predictive for objective response to anti-EGFR treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Boeck; Andreas Jung; Rüdiger P Laubender; Jens Neumann; Rosalind Egg; Clara Goritschan; Steffen Ormanns; Michael Haas; Dominik P Modest; Thomas Kirchner; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  Pancreatic cancer: from state-of-the-art treatments to promising novel therapies.

Authors:  Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Phase I/II Study of Refametinib (BAY 86-9766) in Combination with Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Hanno Riess; Jacek Jassem; Michael Haas; Uwe M Martens; Colin Weekes; Marc Peeters; Paul Ross; John Bridgewater; Bohuslav Melichar; Stefano Cascinu; Piotr Saramak; Patrick Michl; David Van Brummelen; Alberto Zaniboni; Wollf Schmiegel; Svein Dueland; Marius Giurescu; Vittorio L Garosi; Katrin Roth; Anke Schulz; Henrik Seidel; Prabhu Rajagopalan; Michael Teufel; Barrett H Childs
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.493

7.  Inactivation of Ink4a/Arf leads to deregulated expression of miRNAs in K-Ras transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shadan Ali; Sanjeev Banerjee; Farah Logna; Bin Bao; Philip A Philip; Murray Korc; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Phase II Trial of Cetuximab and Conformal Radiotherapy Only in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer with Concurrent Tissue Sampling Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Agata I Rembielak; Pooja Jain; Andrew S Jackson; Melanie M Green; Gillian R Santorelli; Gillian A Whitfield; Adrian Crellin; Angel Garcia-Alonso; Ganesh Radhakrishna; James Cullen; M Ben Taylor; Ric Swindell; Catharine M West; Juan Valle; Azeem Saleem; Patricia M Price
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Effect of simvastatin plus cetuximab/irinotecan for KRAS mutant colorectal cancer and predictive value of the RAS signature for treatment response to cetuximab.

Authors:  Jeeyun Lee; Yong Sang Hong; Jung Yong Hong; Se Won Han; Tae Won Kim; Hye Jin Kang; Tae You Kim; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Suk Hyung Kim; In-Gu Do; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Insuk Sohn; Se Hoon Park; Joon Oh Park; Ho Yeong Lim; Yong Beom Cho; Woo Yong Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Young Suk Park; Won Ki Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.850

10.  Complexity of molecular alterations impacts pancreatic cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Ivonne Regel; Bo Kong; Philipp Bruns; Christoph W Michalski; Jörg Kleeff
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.