Literature DB >> 21862397

Using Cognitive Work Analysis to fit decision support tools to nurse managers' work flow.

Judith A Effken1, Barbara B Brewer, Melanie D Logue, Sheila M Gephart, Joyce A Verran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To better understand the environmental constraints on nurse managers that impact their need for and use of decision support tools, we conducted a Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA). A complete CWA includes system analyses at five levels: work domain, decision-making procedures, decision-making strategies, social organization/collaboration, and worker skill level. Here we describe the results of the Work Domain Analysis (WDA) portion in detail then integrate the WDA with other portions of the CWA, reported previously, to generate a more complete picture of the nurse manager's work domain.
METHODS: Data for the WDA were obtained from semi-structured interviews with nurse managers, division directors, CNOs, and other managers (n = 20) on 10 patient care units in three Arizona hospitals. The WDA described the nurse manager's environment in terms of the constraints it imposes on the nurse manager's ability to achieve targeted outcomes through organizational goals and priorities, functions, processes, as well as work objects and resources (e.g., people, equipment, technology, and data). Constraints were identified and summarized through qualitative thematic analysis.
RESULTS: The results highlight the competing priorities, and external and internal constraints that today's nurse managers must satisfy as they try to improve quality and safety outcomes on their units. Nurse managers receive a great deal of data, much in electronic format. Although dashboards were perceived as helpful because they integrated some data elements, no decision support tools were available to help nurse managers with planning or answering "what if" questions. The results suggest both the need for additional decision support to manage the growing complexity of the environment, and the constraints the environment places on the design of that technology if it is to be effective. Limitations of the study include the small homogeneous sample and the reliance on interview data targeting safety and quality.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21862397      PMCID: PMC3206610          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  14 in total

1.  Different lenses, improved outcomes: a new approach to the analysis and design of healthcare information systems.

Authors:  Judith A Effken
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational, and social issues.

Authors:  B Kaplan; N T Shaw
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Nursing documentation usage analysis.

Authors:  Cindy Robertson; Cynthia L Robertson; Efthimis N Efthimiadis; Kenric W Hammond
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

4.  Leadership behaviour of nurse managers in relation to job satisfaction and work climate.

Authors:  Stina Fransson Sellgren; Göran Ekvall; Göran Tomson
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Lessons learned from a lateral violence and team-building intervention.

Authors:  Ann Barrett; Carolyn Piatek; Susan Korber; Cynthia Padula
Journal:  Nurs Adm Q       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec

6.  Correlations of nursing communication network metrics with patient outcomes.

Authors:  Judith Effken; Sheila Gephart; Denise Bianchi; Joyce Verran
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

7.  Diamonds in the rough: positive deviance and complexity.

Authors:  Thomas R Clancy
Journal:  J Nurs Adm       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.737

8.  Patients as actors: the patient's role in detecting, preventing, and recovering from medical errors.

Authors:  Kenton T Unruh; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 9.  Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism.

Authors:  B Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Modeling a medical environment: an ontology for integrated medical informatics design.

Authors:  J R Hajdukiewicz; K J Vicente; D J Doyle; P Milgram; C M Burns
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.046

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of Innovative Emergency Department Information Displays in a Clinical Simulation Center.

Authors:  Nicolette McGeorge; Sudeep Hegde; Rebecca L Berg; Theresa K Guarrera-Schick; David T LaVergne; Sabrina N Casucci; A Zachary Hettinger; Lindsey N Clark; Li Lin; Rollin J Fairbanks; Natalie C Benda; Longsheng Sun; Robert L Wears; Shawna Perry; Ann Bisantz
Journal:  J Cogn Eng Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12

2.  Simulating nursing unit performance with OrgAhead: strengths and challenges.

Authors:  Judith A Effken; Kathleen M Carley; Ju-Sung Lee; Barbara B Brewer; Joyce A Verran
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Understanding complex clinical reasoning in infectious diseases for improving clinical decision support design.

Authors:  Roosan Islam; Charlene R Weir; Makoto Jones; Guilherme Del Fiol; Matthew H Samore
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Using team cognitive work analysis to reveal healthcare team interactions in a birthing unit.

Authors:  Maryam Ashoori; Catherine M Burns; Barbara d'Entremont; Kathryn Momtahan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 2.778

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.