PURPOSE: To identify a clinically meaningful threshold for change in retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography for patients with uveitic macular edema using correlation with change in visual acuity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. METHODS:One hundred twenty-eight eyes (101 individuals) with macular edema enrolled in the Multicenter Uveitis Steroid Treatment (MUST) trial. At enrollment and after 6 months of follow-up, retinal thickness was measured at the central subfield with time-domain optical coherence tomography and visual acuity was measured with logarithmic (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts. Participants were classified as having macular edema if the retinal thickness was 260 μm or more. RESULTS: A threshold for change in retinal center subfield thickness of 20% balanced the percentage of false positives and false negatives for predicting more than a 10-letter change in visual acuity with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 75%. The results were similar for more than 5-letter changes and for 15-letter or more changes. Those with a 20% or more reduction in retinal thickness had a mean 11.0-letter improvement (95% confidence interval, 7.7 to 14.3) as compared with a -0.4-letter change (95% confidence interval, -4.1 to 3.3) in visual acuity for those without a 20% reduction (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to being above the level of measurement uncertainty, a 20% change in retinal thickness in patients with macular edema seems to be optimal for clinically important changes in visual acuity and may be considered as an outcome for clinical trials of treatments for uveitic macular edema.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To identify a clinically meaningful threshold for change in retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography for patients with uveitic macular edema using correlation with change in visual acuity. DESIGN: Cross-sectional and longitudinal study. METHODS: One hundred twenty-eight eyes (101 individuals) with macular edema enrolled in the Multicenter UveitisSteroid Treatment (MUST) trial. At enrollment and after 6 months of follow-up, retinal thickness was measured at the central subfield with time-domain optical coherence tomography and visual acuity was measured with logarithmic (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) visual acuity charts. Participants were classified as having macular edema if the retinal thickness was 260 μm or more. RESULTS: A threshold for change in retinal center subfield thickness of 20% balanced the percentage of false positives and false negatives for predicting more than a 10-letter change in visual acuity with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 75%. The results were similar for more than 5-letter changes and for 15-letter or more changes. Those with a 20% or more reduction in retinal thickness had a mean 11.0-letter improvement (95% confidence interval, 7.7 to 14.3) as compared with a -0.4-letter change (95% confidence interval, -4.1 to 3.3) in visual acuity for those without a 20% reduction (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to being above the level of measurement uncertainty, a 20% change in retinal thickness in patients with macular edema seems to be optimal for clinically important changes in visual acuity and may be considered as an outcome for clinical trials of treatments for uveitic macular edema.
Authors: Roy W Beck; Pamela S Moke; Andrew H Turpin; Frederick L Ferris; John Paul SanGiovanni; Chris A Johnson; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Terry A Cox; R Clifford Blair; Raymond T Kraker Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Esperanza Pato; Mª Auxiliadora Martin-Martinez; Adela Castelló; Rosalía Méndez-Fernandez; Santiago Muñoz-Fernández; Miguel Cordero-Coma; Lucia Martinez-Costa; Elia Valls; Miguel Reyes; Félix Francisco; Mar Esteban; Alex Fonollosa; Fernando Sanchez-Alonso; Cruz Fernández-Espartero; Teresa Diaz-Valle; José Miguel Carrasco; Emma Beltran-Catalán; Marisa Hernández-Garfella; María Victoria Hernández; Laura Pelegrin; Ricardo Blanco; David Diaz-Valle Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: John H Kempen; Michael M Altaweel; Lea T Drye; Janet T Holbrook; Douglas A Jabs; Elizabeth A Sugar; Jennifer E Thorne Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Marc H Levin; Maxwell Pistilli; Ebenezer Daniel; Sapna S Gangaputra; Robert B Nussenblatt; James T Rosenbaum; Eric B Suhler; Jennifer E Thorne; C Stephen Foster; Douglas A Jabs; Grace A Levy-Clarke; John H Kempen Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Oren Tomkins-Netzer; Susan Lightman; Lea Drye; John Kempen; Gary N Holland; Narsing A Rao; Richard J Stawell; Albert Vitale; Douglas A Jabs Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Brian Lehpamer; Erin Moshier; Patricia Pahk; Naomi Goldberg; Jessica Ackert; James Godbold; Douglas A Jabs Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: John H Kempen; Mark L Van Natta; Michael M Altaweel; James P Dunn; Douglas A Jabs; Susan L Lightman; Jennifer E Thorne; Janet T Holbrook Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Elizabeth Shen; Sivakumar R Rathinam; Manohar Babu; Anuradha Kanakath; Radhika Thundikandy; Salena M Lee; Erica N Browne; Travis C Porco; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.258