PURPOSE: To evaluate a logarithmic transformation of retinal thickness measurements from optical coherence tomography as a new approach to assess clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness. DESIGN: Methodologic, evidence-based review. METHODS: Standard published approaches for assessing change in retinal thickness over time, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), were compared with a new approach based on a logarithmic transformation of the retinal thickness data. Comparative examples were derived using published data from a clinical trial comparing intravitreal corticosteroid injections for diabetic macular edema with standard laser treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparative examples using Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network data. RESULTS: Logarithmic transformation of retinal thickness data results in a more normalized distribution of OCT data and allows for data analyses assessing proportionate changes in retinal thickness during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For analysis of grouped data, a logarithmic transformation of the OCT retinal thickness measurements (logOCT) provides several analytic advantages. Distributions of retinal thickness in groups of eyes with diabetic macular edema, and many other causes of macular thickening, tend to be skewed to the right; the logOCT transformation tends to normalize these distributions, which has value for statistical comparisons. For assessing whether the observed OCT change in a patient is real (and not due to testing variability), a 1-step log scale change exceeds the measurement error for all degrees of retinal thickness in current instruments. In addition, this log scale is similar to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale used for visual acuity. Steps on the log scale for change in thickness seem to be better related to clinical importance than the actual change in microns because each step on the log scale is the same proportionate change in thickness, with a 3-step change equaling a halving or doubling of thickness, regardless of the baseline value. Transformation of OCT retinal thickness data to logOCT may assist in the assessment of clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness just as use of the logMAR scale has helped to assess clinically meaningful changes in visual acuity. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a logarithmic transformation of retinal thickness measurements from optical coherence tomography as a new approach to assess clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness. DESIGN: Methodologic, evidence-based review. METHODS: Standard published approaches for assessing change in retinal thickness over time, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), were compared with a new approach based on a logarithmic transformation of the retinal thickness data. Comparative examples were derived using published data from a clinical trial comparing intravitreal corticosteroid injections for diabetic macular edema with standard laser treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparative examples using Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network data. RESULTS: Logarithmic transformation of retinal thickness data results in a more normalized distribution of OCT data and allows for data analyses assessing proportionate changes in retinal thickness during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For analysis of grouped data, a logarithmic transformation of the OCT retinal thickness measurements (logOCT) provides several analytic advantages. Distributions of retinal thickness in groups of eyes with diabetic macular edema, and many other causes of macular thickening, tend to be skewed to the right; the logOCT transformation tends to normalize these distributions, which has value for statistical comparisons. For assessing whether the observed OCT change in a patient is real (and not due to testing variability), a 1-step log scale change exceeds the measurement error for all degrees of retinal thickness in current instruments. In addition, this log scale is similar to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) scale used for visual acuity. Steps on the log scale for change in thickness seem to be better related to clinical importance than the actual change in microns because each step on the log scale is the same proportionate change in thickness, with a 3-step change equaling a halving or doubling of thickness, regardless of the baseline value. Transformation of OCT retinal thickness data to logOCT may assist in the assessment of clinically meaningful changes in retinal thickness just as use of the logMAR scale has helped to assess clinically meaningful changes in visual acuity. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Daniel F Kiernan; Seenu M Hariprasad; Eric K Chin; Claire L Kiernan; James Rago; William F Mieler Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Magdalena G Krzystolik; Samara F Strauber; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; David J Browning; Robert B Chambers; Ronald P Danis; Matthew D Davis; Adam R Glassman; Victor H Gonzalez; Paul B Greenberg; Jeffrey G Gross; Judy E Kim; Craig Kollman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David J Browning; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; David M Brown; Donald S Fong; Neil M Bressler; Ronald P Danis; James L Kinyoun; Quan Dong Nguyen; Abdhish R Bhavsar; Justin Gottlieb; Dante J Pieramici; Michael E Rauser; Rajendra S Apte; Jennifer I Lim; Päivi H Miskala Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: David J Browning; Adam R Glassman; Lloyd P Aiello; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Ronald P Danis; Matthew D Davis; Frederick L Ferris; Suber S Huang; Peter K Kaiser; Craig Kollman; Srinavas Sadda; Ingrid U Scott; Haijing Qin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Neil M Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Andrew N Antoszyk; Roy W Beck; David J Browning; Antonio P Ciardella; Ronald P Danis; Michael J Elman; Scott M Friedman; Adam R Glassman; Jeffrey G Gross; Helen K Li; Timothy J Murtha; Thomas W Stone; Jennifer K Sun Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2008-02-21 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Roy W Beck; Pamela S Moke; Andrew H Turpin; Frederick L Ferris; John Paul SanGiovanni; Chris A Johnson; Eileen E Birch; Danielle L Chandler; Terry A Cox; R Clifford Blair; Raymond T Kraker Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Christina J Flaxel; Allison R Edwards; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Paul G Arrigg; Roy W Beck; Neil M Bressler; Susan B Bressler; Frederick L Ferris; Shailesh K Gupta; Julia A Haller; Howard S Lazarus; Haijing Qin Journal: Retina Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Catherine A Cukras; Philip Petrou; Emily Y Chew; Catherine B Meyerle; Wai T Wong Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: L Nicholson; N V Patrao; J Ramu; C Vazquez-Alfageme; M Muwas; R Rajendram; P G Hykin; S Sivaprasad Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Elizabeth A Sugar; Douglas A Jabs; Michael M Altaweel; Sue Lightman; Nisha Acharya; Albert T Vitale; Jennifer E Thorne Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2011-09-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Jennifer E Foreman; Wen-Chi L Chang; Prajakta S Palkar; Bokai Zhu; Michael G Borland; Jennie L Williams; Lance R Kramer; Margie L Clapper; Frank J Gonzalez; Jeffrey M Peters Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2011-03-11 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: Carl W Baker; Talat Almukhtar; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Sandeep Grover; Stephen J Kim; Timothy J Murtha; Michael E Rauser; Cynthia Stockdale Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.389