Literature DB >> 15922156

Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality.

Jonathan A Fugelsang1, Matthew E Roser, Paul M Corballis, Michael S Gazzaniga, Kevin N Dunbar.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine the neural correlates of perceptual causality. Participants were imaged while viewing alternating blocks of causal events in which a ball collides with, and causes movement of another ball, versus non-causal events in which a spatial or a temporal gap precedes the movement of a second ball. There were significantly higher levels of relative activation in the right middle frontal gyrus and the right inferior parietal lobule for causal relative to non-causal events. Furthermore, when the differential effects of spatial and temporal incontiguities were subtracted from the contiguous stimuli, we observed both common (right prefrontal) and unique (right parietal and right temporal) regions of activation as a function of spatial and temporal processing of contiguity, respectively. Taken together, these data provide a means to help determine how the visual system extracts causality from dynamic visual information in the environment using spatial and temporal cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15922156     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  17 in total

1.  The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; David Wolk; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Beta- and gamma-band activity reflect predictive coding in the processing of causal events.

Authors:  Stan van Pelt; Lieke Heil; Johan Kwisthout; Sasha Ondobaka; Iris van Rooij; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Neural theory for the perception of causal actions.

Authors:  Falk Fleischer; Andrea Christensen; Vittorio Caggiano; Peter Thier; Martin A Giese
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 4.  Minding time in an amodal representational space.

Authors:  Virginie van Wassenhove
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Carving the world for language: how neuroscientific research can enrich the study of first and second language learning.

Authors:  Nathan R George; Tilbe Göksun; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Space, time, and causality in the human brain.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Roy H Hamilton; Alexander Kranjec; Preet Minhaus; Marom Bikson; Jonathan Yu; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Right hemisphere dominance in visual statistical learning.

Authors:  Matthew E Roser; József Fiser; Richard N Aslin; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Deconstructing events: the neural bases for space, time, and causality.

Authors:  Alexander Kranjec; Eileen R Cardillo; Gwenda L Schmidt; Matthew Lehet; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Space and time in perceptual causality.

Authors:  Benjamin Straube; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: common and uniquely human features.

Authors:  R Peeters; L Simone; K Nelissen; M Fabbri-Destro; W Vanduffel; G Rizzolatti; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.