Literature DB >> 21861222

Preoperative predictors of nipple-areola complex involvement for patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer.

Julie A Y Billar1, Amylou C Dueck, Richard J Gray, Nabil Wasif, Barbara A Pockaj.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proper patient selection is important for nipple-sparing mastectomy, and we aimed to identify preoperative factors predictive of pathologic nipple-areola complex (NAC) involvement to assist with surgical planning.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent mastectomy for DCIS or invasive breast cancer at a single institution. Cases with NAC involvement, NAC(+), were compared with those without NAC involvement, NAC(-). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine preoperative factors independently predictive of NAC involvement.
RESULTS: A total of 238 standard, 107 skin-sparing, and 47 nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed, and the NAC was pathologically involved in 16% (N = 62). Clinical NAC involvement, as determined by patient symptoms or physical exam, was present in 61% of NAC(+) but only 14% of NAC(-) cases (P < .0001) and carried a 92% negative predictive value (NPV). Preoperative imaging involved the NAC in 38% of NAC(+) but only 4% of NAC(-) cases (P < .0001) and carried an 89% NPV. NAC(+) tumors were larger, with mean size 3.3 cm versus 2.5 cm for NAC(-) tumors (P = .024). The mean tumor-to-nipple distance was 2.0 cm for NAC(+) versus 4.7 cm for NAC(-) tumors (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of NAC involvement were the presence of clinical NAC involvement (odds ratio [OR] 5.11, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.53-10.35) and imaging involvement of the NAC (OR 5.82, 95% CI 2.43-13.94).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and imaging abnormalities at the NAC are the only independent preoperative predictors of NAC pathology, and the absence of these factors conveys a low probability of NAC involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21861222     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2008-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  Pathologic-radiologic correlation in evaluation of retroareolar margin in nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Dipti M Karamchandani; Alison L Chetlen; Meghan P Riley; Susann Schetter; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Julie Mack
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Preoperative Ultrasound-guided Sub-areolar Biopsy in Predicting Occult Nipple Involvement in Breast Cancer Patients: Proposal for a Methodological Approach.

Authors:  Vittorio Altomare; Paolo Orsaria; Antonella Grasso; Lorenza Caggiati; Edy Ippolito; Francesco Pantano; Matteo Sammarra; Carlo Altomare; Giuseppe Perrone; Gabriella Gullotta; Rita Carino
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Tumor-to-Nipple Distance in Selecting Patients for Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon L Kracoff-Sella; Tanir M Allweis; Inna Bokov; Hadas Kadar-Sfarad; Yehonatan Shifer; Evgenia Golzman; Dana Egozi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-07-21

4.  Nipple-sparing mastectomies: Clinical outcomes from a single academic institution.

Authors:  Barbara Dull; Leah Conant; Terence Myckatyn; Marissa Tenenbaum; Amy Cyr; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-04

5.  Nipple Areola Complex Involvement in Invasive Carcinoma Breast.

Authors:  Paul Augustine; Soundrarajan Alagu Ramesh; Ramachandran Krishnankutty Nair; Renu Sukumaran; Regi Jose; Kurian Cherian; Madhu Muralee; Iqbal Ahamad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Conservative mastectomy versus nipple-sparing mastectomy: preliminary considerations of oncological safety on 30 patients not receiving intra-operative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tito Brambullo; Erica Dalla Venezia; Stefano Martella; Vincenzo Vindigni; Franco Bassetto; Alessandra Gottardi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Jean-Yves Petit; Paolo Veronesi; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique.

Authors:  Uhi Toh; Miki Takenaka; Nobutaka Iwakuma; Yoshito Akagi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Effect of the Nipple-Excising Breast-Conserving Therapy in Female Breast Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis and Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Results Based on the SEER Database.

Authors:  Shouyu Li; Yuting Zhao; Lutong Yan; Zejian Yang; Pei Qiu; Heyan Chen; Yudong Zhou; Ligang Niu; Yu Yan; Wei Zhang; Huimin Zhang; Jianjun He; Can Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 9.  Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Breast Cancer: From an Oncologic Safety Perspective.

Authors:  Nai-Si Huang; Jiong Wu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Clinical value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer: A comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI.

Authors:  Jang Yoo; Bom Sahn Kim; Jin Chung; Hai-Jeon Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.