Literature DB >> 21859613

Estimation of mouse organ locations through registration of a statistical mouse atlas with micro-CT images.

Hongkai Wang1, David B Stout, Arion F Chatziioannou.   

Abstract

Micro-CT is widely used in preclinical studies of small animals. Due to the low soft-tissue contrast in typical studies, segmentation of soft tissue organs from noncontrast enhanced micro-CT images is a challenging problem. Here, we propose an atlas-based approach for estimating the major organs in mouse micro-CT images. A statistical atlas of major trunk organs was constructed based on 45 training subjects. The statistical shape model technique was used to include inter-subject anatomical variations. The shape correlations between different organs were described using a conditional Gaussian model. For registration, first the high-contrast organs in micro-CT images were registered by fitting the statistical shape model, while the low-contrast organs were subsequently estimated from the high-contrast organs using the conditional Gaussian model. The registration accuracy was validated based on 23 noncontrast-enhanced and 45 contrast-enhanced micro-CT images. Three different accuracy metrics (Dice coefficient, organ volume recovery coefficient, and surface distance) were used for evaluation. The Dice coefficients vary from 0.45 ± 0.18 for the spleen to 0.90 ± 0.02 for the lungs, the volume recovery coefficients vary from 0.96 ± 0.10 for the liver to 1.30 ± 0.75 for the spleen, the surface distances vary from 0.18 ± 0.01 mm for the lungs to 0.72 ± 0.42 mm for the spleen. The registration accuracy of the statistical atlas was compared with two publicly available single-subject mouse atlases, i.e., the MOBY phantom and the DIGIMOUSE atlas, and the results proved that the statistical atlas is more accurate than the single atlases. To evaluate the influence of the training subject size, different numbers of training subjects were used for atlas construction and registration. The results showed an improvement of the registration accuracy when more training subjects were used for the atlas construction. The statistical atlas-based registration was also compared with the thin-plate spline based deformable registration, commonly used in mouse atlas registration. The results revealed that the statistical atlas has the advantage of improving the estimation of low-contrast organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21859613      PMCID: PMC3267384          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2165294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  43 in total

1.  Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation.

Authors:  Hyunjin Park; Peyton H Bland; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Mutual information in coupled multi-shape model for medical image segmentation.

Authors:  A Tsai; W Wells; C Tempany; E Grimson; A Willsky
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data.

Authors:  Belma Dogdas; David Stout; Arion F Chatziioannou; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Small animal imaging with magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Bastiaan Driehuys; John Nouls; Alexandra Badea; Elizabeth Bucholz; Ketan Ghaghada; Alexandra Petiet; Laurence W Hedlund
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

5.  Methods of artificial enlargement of the training set for statistical shape models.

Authors:  Juha Koikkalainen; Tuomas Tölli; Kirsi Lauerma; Kari Antila; Elina Mattila; Mikko Lilja; Jyrki Lötjönen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Statistical shape model based segmentation of medical images.

Authors:  A Neumann; C Lorenz
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Automated segmentation and quantification of liver and spleen from CT images using normalized probabilistic atlases and enhancement estimation.

Authors:  Marius George Linguraru; Jesse K Sandberg; Zhixi Li; Furhawn Shah; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Articulated whole-body atlases for small animal image analysis: construction and applications.

Authors:  Artem Khmelinskii; Martin Baiker; Eric L Kaijzel; Josette Chen; Johan H C Reiber; Boudewijn P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Multimodality rodent imaging chambers for use under barrier conditions with gas anesthesia.

Authors:  Chris Suckow; Claudia Kuntner; Patrick Chow; Robert Silverman; Arion Chatziioannou; David Stout
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  In vivo evaluation and small-animal PET/CT of a prostate cancer mouse model using 64Cu bombesin analogs: side-by-side comparison of the CB-TE2A and DOTA chelation systems.

Authors:  Jered C Garrison; Tammy L Rold; Gary L Sieckman; Said Daibes Figueroa; Wynn A Volkert; Silvia S Jurisson; Timothy J Hoffman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  21 in total

1.  A hybrid registration-based method for whole-body micro-CT mice images.

Authors:  Xiaochao Qu; Xueyuan Gao; Xianhui Xu; Shouping Zhu; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A wavelet-based single-view reconstruction approach for cone beam x-ray luminescence tomography imaging.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Hongkai Wang; Mantao Xu; Shengdong Nie; Hongbing Lu
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

4.  Bioluminescence tomography with structural information estimated via statistical mouse atlas registration.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Wanzhou Yin; Hao Liu; Xu Cao; Hongkai Wang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Automatic multiatlas based organ at risk segmentation in mice.

Authors:  Brent van der Heyden; Mark Podesta; Daniëlle Bp Eekers; Ana Vaniqui; Isabel P Almeida; Lotte Ejr Schyns; Stefan J van Hoof; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Non-Rigid Image Registration Using Gaussian Mixture Models.

Authors:  Sangeetha Somayajula; Anand A Joshi; Richard M Leahy
Journal:  Biomed Image Registration       Date:  2012

7.  Multi-atlas registration and adaptive hexahedral voxel discretization for fast bioluminescence tomography.

Authors:  Shenghan Ren; Haihong Hu; Gen Li; Xu Cao; Shouping Zhu; Xueli Chen; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Deformable torso phantoms of Chinese adults for personalized anatomy modelling.

Authors:  Hongkai Wang; Xiaobang Sun; Tongning Wu; Congsheng Li; Zhonghua Chen; Meiying Liao; Mengci Li; Wen Yan; Hui Huang; Jia Yang; Ziyu Tan; Libo Hui; Yue Liu; Hang Pan; Yue Qu; Zhaofeng Chen; Liwen Tan; Lijuan Yu; Hongcheng Shi; Li Huo; Yanjun Zhang; Xin Tang; Shaoxiang Zhang; Changjian Liu
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Performance Evaluation of G8, a High-Sensitivity Benchtop Preclinical PET/CT Tomograph.

Authors:  Zheng Gu; Richard Taschereau; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Robert W Silverman; Jason T Lee; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  MARS: a mouse atlas registration system based on a planar x-ray projector and an optical camera.

Authors:  Hongkai Wang; David B Stout; Richard Taschereau; Zheng Gu; Nam T Vu; David L Prout; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.