Literature DB >> 21859204

Happy mouth and sad eyes: scanning emotional facial expressions.

Hedwig Eisenbarth1, Georg W Alpers2.   

Abstract

There is evidence that specific regions of the face such as the eyes are particularly relevant for the decoding of emotional expressions, but it has not been examined whether scan paths of observers vary for facial expressions with different emotional content. In this study, eye-tracking was used to monitor scanning behavior of healthy participants while looking at different facial expressions. Locations of fixations and their durations were recorded, and a dominance ratio (i.e., eyes and mouth relative to the rest of the face) was calculated. Across all emotional expressions, initial fixations were most frequently directed to either the eyes or the mouth. Especially in sad facial expressions, participants more frequently issued the initial fixation to the eyes compared with all other expressions. In happy facial expressions, participants fixated the mouth region for a longer time across all trials. For fearful and neutral facial expressions, the dominance ratio indicated that both the eyes and mouth are equally important. However, in sad and angry facial expressions, the eyes received more attention than the mouth. These results confirm the relevance of the eyes and mouth in emotional decoding, but they also demonstrate that not all facial expressions with different emotional content are decoded equally. Our data suggest that people look at regions that are most characteristic for each emotion. 2011 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21859204     DOI: 10.1037/a0022758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  73 in total

1.  Brain signatures of perceiving a smile: Time course and source localization.

Authors:  David Beltrán; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Facial expression discrimination varies with presentation time but not with fixation on features: a backward masking study using eye-tracking.

Authors:  Karly N Neath; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-07-23

3.  Intentionally distracting: Working memory is disrupted by the perception of other agents attending to you - even without eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Clara Colombatto; Benjamin van Buren; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Neural processing of fearful and happy facial expressions during emotion-relevant and emotion-irrelevant tasks: A fixation-to-feature approach.

Authors:  Karly N Neath-Tavares; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Developmental changes in the primacy of facial cues for emotion recognition.

Authors:  Brian T Leitzke; Seth D Pollak
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-01-18

6.  Oxytocin attenuates neural reactivity to masked threat cues from the eyes.

Authors:  Manuela Kanat; Markus Heinrichs; Ralf Schwarzwald; Gregor Domes
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Early event-related potentials to emotional faces differ for adults with autism spectrum disorder and by serotonin transporter genotype.

Authors:  Susan Faja; Geraldine Dawson; Elizabeth Aylward; Ellen M Wijsman; Sara Jane Webb
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Confidence of emotion expression recognition recruits brain regions outside the face perception network.

Authors:  Indrit Bègue; Maarten Vaessen; Jeremy Hofmeister; Marice Pereira; Sophie Schwartz; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 9.  Eye Tracking Studies Exploring Cognitive and Affective Processes among Alcohol Drinkers: a Systematic Review and Perspectives.

Authors:  Pierre Maurage; Zoé Bollen; Nicolas Masson; Fabien D'Hondt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Detection and perceptual impact of side-to-side facial movement asymmetry.

Authors:  Sang W Kim; Elizabeth S Heller; Marc H Hohman; Tessa A Hadlock; James T Heaton
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.