Emily R Atkins1, David B Preen, Catherine Jarman, Leon D Cohen. 1. Centre for Health Services Research, School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. eatkins@meddent.uwa.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We compared percent excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) and resolution of dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the 4 years following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between patients calibrated with a 40-French (40F) or a 50-French (50F) bougie. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective descriptive study of routinely collected pre- and post-surgical data from 294 patients who underwent LSG at a single surgical centre (50F--n = 106, 40F--n = 185). Obesity measurements were taken prior to surgery and at regular intervals until 48 months post-surgery. Co-morbidity resolution was also assessed across the 48-month observation period. Multivariate regression modelling was used to control analyses for baseline obesity and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: At 48 months post-surgery mean (±SD) %EBMIL was 60.2 ± 27.6% and 45.4 ± 38.4% for those treated with the 40F and 50F bougie, respectively. After controlling for sociodemographic variables and baseline excess weight, mean %EBMIL was 15.5% greater with a 40F bougie compared with a 50F bougie at the end of follow-up. The likelihood of dyslipidaemia resolution within 48 months post-LSG was 19.0 times greater (p = 0.006), hypertension resolution 3.6 times greater (p = 0.005) and type 2 diabetes mellitus resolution 5.2 times greater (p = 0.034) by 4 years post-surgery in patients treated with the 40F bougie compared with a 50F bougie. CONCLUSION: Improved obesity reduction and resolution of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus is experienced during the 4 years following surgery by patients treated with a 40F bougie compared with the 50F. These findings remain when controlling for potential confounding clinical and sociodemographic factors.
BACKGROUND: We compared percent excess body mass index loss (%EBMIL) and resolution of dyslipidaemia, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the 4 years following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) between patients calibrated with a 40-French (40F) or a 50-French (50F) bougie. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective descriptive study of routinely collected pre- and post-surgical data from 294 patients who underwent LSG at a single surgical centre (50F--n = 106, 40F--n = 185). Obesity measurements were taken prior to surgery and at regular intervals until 48 months post-surgery. Co-morbidity resolution was also assessed across the 48-month observation period. Multivariate regression modelling was used to control analyses for baseline obesity and sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: At 48 months post-surgery mean (±SD) %EBMIL was 60.2 ± 27.6% and 45.4 ± 38.4% for those treated with the 40F and 50F bougie, respectively. After controlling for sociodemographic variables and baseline excess weight, mean %EBMIL was 15.5% greater with a 40F bougie compared with a 50F bougie at the end of follow-up. The likelihood of dyslipidaemia resolution within 48 months post-LSG was 19.0 times greater (p = 0.006), hypertension resolution 3.6 times greater (p = 0.005) and type 2 diabetes mellitus resolution 5.2 times greater (p = 0.034) by 4 years post-surgery in patients treated with the 40F bougie compared with a 50F bougie. CONCLUSION: Improved obesity reduction and resolution of dyslipidaemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus is experienced during the 4 years following surgery by patients treated with a 40F bougie compared with the 50F. These findings remain when controlling for potential confounding clinical and sociodemographic factors.
Authors: Jeffrey I Mechanick; Robert F Kushner; Harvey J Sugerman; J Michael Gonzalez-Campoy; Maria L Collazo-Clavell; Safak Guven; Adam F Spitz; Caroline M Apovian; Edward H Livingston; Robert Brolin; David B Sarwer; Wendy A Anderson; John Dixon Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2008-08-19 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Timothy M Farrell; Stephen P Haggerty; D Wayne Overby; Geoffrey P Kohn; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2009-01-06 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Felix B Langer; Arthur Bohdjalian; Franz X Felberbauer; Edith Fleischmann; Mir A Reza Hoda; Bernhard Ludvik; Johannes Zacherl; Raimund Jakesz; Gerhard Prager Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Nasser Sakran; Asnat Raziel; Ian M Gralnek; Zvi Perry; Kamal K Mahawar; Scott A Shikora; David Goitein Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Amaia Rodríguez; Sara Becerril; Víctor Valentí; Beatriz Ramírez; Marina Martín; Leire Méndez-Giménez; Andoni Lancha; Pablo del Sol Calderón; Victoria Catalán; María A Burrell; Javier Gómez-Ambrosi; Gema Frühbeck Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Rosana Martínez; José María Bonete; José María Rico; Lorea Zubiaga; Maria Diez; Carolina Llavero Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 4.129