Literature DB >> 21858558

The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution.

So-Yoon Lee1, Yoon Woo Koh, Bo Gyung Kim, Hyun Jun Hong, Jun Hui Jeong, Eun Chang Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, the modified facelift incision (FLI) has gained increasing popularity for its cosmetic benefits in parotidectomy. However, many surgeons remain concerned with the adequacy of the exposure and are unwilling to use the FLI for anterior or superior tumors of the parotid gland because these tumors are closer to the superficially positioned facial nerve branch. To evaluate the changing trends in parotidectomy incisions for benign lesions at a single institute, and to compare the surgical outcomes between the modified Blair incision (BI) and FLI, and determine the adequacy and possible indications or limitations of the FLI, especially for tumors located in the anterior or superior parotid gland.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study analyzed 357 patients who had various benign parotid diseases and underwent parotidectomy at Severance Hospital between January 2005 and December 2009. Revisions or recurrences and histologically confirmed malignancies were excluded. Tumor location was divided into superficial and deep lobes. The superficial lobe was subdivided into anterior, superior, inferior, and middle portions. Patients' profiles, surgical outcomes, and cosmetic satisfaction score on a scale of 0 (extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (extremely satisfied) were compared.
RESULTS: In all, 344 patients underwent BI or FLI. The FLI was performed increasingly each year. For anterior (n = 58) or superior tumors (n = 32), there was no significant difference between the type of incision and tumor size or complications. No facial nerve palsy occurred in either group. For deep-lobe tumors (n = 67), the mean tumor size was significantly larger in the BI group (p = 0.025). There was a significant difference between facial nerve palsy and tumor size (p < 0.001) but no significant difference between facial nerve palsy and tumor location (p = 0.145) or the type of incision (p = 0.530). The mean scar satisfaction score was significantly higher in the FLI group (p <0.001). There was a positive correlation between the scar and deep hollow satisfaction score (Pearson coefficient of correlation = 0.547; p < 0.001)
CONCLUSIONS: The modified facelift incision is feasible for most benign parotid lesions regardless of tumor location, even for anterior or superior tumors. Using the modified facelift incision may be extended with a surgeon's accumulated experience, but for a large deep-lobe tumor, the modified Blair incision is still considered useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21858558     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1209-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Temporoparietal fascia flaps and superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication in parotid surgery reduces Frey's syndrome.

Authors:  Luc Cesteleyn; Joseph Helman; Steven King; Gaétan Van de Vyvere
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Facelift approach with a hybrid SMAS rotation advancement flap in parotidectomy for prevention of scars and contour deficiency affecting the neck and sweat secretion of the cheek.

Authors:  Johannes Franz Hönig
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Further anatomical approaches to parotid surgery.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem K Jerjes; Seyed Ahmad Reza Nouraei; William Grant; Sandeep Singh; Holger Sudhoff; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Parotidectomy: assessment of a surgical technique including facelift incision and SMAS advancement.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Meningaud; Chloe Bertolus; Jacques-Charles Bertrand
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Hidden incision in surgery of parotid, submandibular, cervical, and cheek benign tumors.

Authors:  J Guerrerosantos; S Dicksheet; C Guillen; N Andino
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Risk of facial palsy and severe Frey's syndrome after conservative parotidectomy for benign disease: analysis of 610 operations.

Authors:  Orlando Guntinas-Lichius; Bettina Gabriel; J Peter Klussmann
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Prevention of Frey's syndrome with superficial musculoaponeurotic system interposition.

Authors:  G R Allison; I Rappaport
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Patients' perspectives on the short- and long-term outcomes following surgery for benign parotid neoplasms.

Authors:  Andrew H Marshall; Shahed M Quraishi; Patrick J Bradley
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.469

9.  [Aesthetic parotidectomy: face lift incision and SMAS flap].

Authors:  J Paris; O Richard; B Lafont; F Facon; M Bruzzo
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  2007

10.  The stylomastoid artery as an anatomical landmark to the facial nerve during parotid surgery: a clinico-anatomic study.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem Jerjes; Seyed Ahmad Reza Nouraei; Sandeep U Singh; Panagiotis Kafas; Ann Sandison; Holger Sudhoff; Colin Hopper
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  8 in total

1.  Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale.

Authors:  Olcay Cem Bulut; Peter Plinkert; Philippe A Federspil
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Small access postaural parotidectomy: an analysis of techniques, feasibility and safety.

Authors:  Anthony Po-Wing Yuen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Robot-assisted submandibular gland excision via modified facelift incision.

Authors:  Seung Wook Jung; Young Kwan Kim; Yong Hoon Cha; Yoon Woo Koh; Woong Nam
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of modified facelift incision versus modified Blair incision in parotidectomy.

Authors:  Yi-Chan Lee; Wei-Chih Liao; Shih-Wei Yang; Cheng-Ming Luo; Yao-Te Tsai; Ming-Shao Tsai; Yi-Hsuan Lee; Li-Jen Hsin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparison of various surgical incisions in parotidectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siyue Yin; Yanxun Han; Yuchen Liu; Bangjie Chen; Ziyue Fu; Shuyan Sheng; Jianpeng Wang; Chuanlu Shen; Xinyi Wang; Yiwen Jia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Cervicomastoidfacial versus modified rhytidectomy incision for benign parotid tumors.

Authors:  Agnaldo José Graciano; Carlos Takahiro Chone; Carlos Augusto Fischer
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

7.  Facelift incision and superficial musculoaponeurotic system advancement in parotidectomy: case reports.

Authors:  Il-Kyu Kim; Hyun-Woo Cho; Hyun-Young Cho; Ji-Hoon Seo; Dong-Hwan Lee; Seung-Hoon Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-11-02

8.  Intra-auricular modification of facelift incision decreased the risk of Frey syndrome.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Chen; Peir-Rong Chen; Yu-Fu Chou
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.