Literature DB >> 15346021

Facelift approach with a hybrid SMAS rotation advancement flap in parotidectomy for prevention of scars and contour deficiency affecting the neck and sweat secretion of the cheek.

Johannes Franz Hönig1.   

Abstract

Tumors of the parotid gland are generally be removed by the standard external bayonet-shaped incision approach without reconstruction of the parotid bed. The disadvantage of this approach is frequently an obvious scar affecting the neck and a conspicuous hollow contour around the angle of the mandible in addition to a sweat secretion of the cheek (Frey syndrome). To overcome these disadvantages, especially the facial depressed deformity subsequent to parotid surgery, during the last several years, the author has concentrated on facelift incision used in combination with a hybrid SMAS rotation advancement flap. Twelve patients (7 male; 5 female) ranging in age from 32 to 73 years (mean age, 57.8 years) fulfilled the selection criterion of having a clinically benign discrete parotid lump with a benign preoperative fine-needle cytology result. Parotidectomy was performed using the modified facelift incision in conjunction with the rotation advancement hybrid SMAS flap. All patients were followed up every 3 months during the first year. During follow-up, the patients were specifically asked about their satisfaction with their postoperative appearance and whether they would consent to the operation again. The vascularized hybrid vicryl mesh/SMAS rotation advancement flap is clinically simple to perform and provides satisfactory cosmetic and functional results in patients undergoing conservative parotidectomy and prevents the gustatory sweating. There are no drawbacks to the use of the modified facelift incision to remove tumors of the parotid gland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15346021     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200409000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  4 in total

1.  Further anatomical approaches to parotid surgery.

Authors:  Tahwinder Upile; Waseem K Jerjes; Seyed Ahmad Reza Nouraei; William Grant; Sandeep Singh; Holger Sudhoff; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The extended indication of parotidectomy using the modified facelift incision in benign lesions: retrospective analysis of a single institution.

Authors:  So-Yoon Lee; Yoon Woo Koh; Bo Gyung Kim; Hyun Jun Hong; Jun Hui Jeong; Eun Chang Choi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Modified facelift incision for partial parotidectomy versus bayonet-shaped incision: a comparison using visual analog scale.

Authors:  Olcay Cem Bulut; Peter Plinkert; Philippe A Federspil
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Facelift incision and superficial musculoaponeurotic system advancement in parotidectomy: case reports.

Authors:  Il-Kyu Kim; Hyun-Woo Cho; Hyun-Young Cho; Ji-Hoon Seo; Dong-Hwan Lee; Seung-Hoon Park
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-11-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.