Literature DB >> 21858265

Correlation analyses of detection thresholds of four different odorants.

R Zernecke1, T Frank, K Haegler, J Albrecht, H Bruckmann, M Wiesmann.   

Abstract

The detection threshold task of the Sniffin` Sticks can be conducted using two different odorants - n-butanol or phenylethyl alcohol (PEA). Previous studies show contradictory results regarding the correlation analysis of the two odorants. The current study investigated the relationship between PEA and n-butanol with respect to previous findings and subject population. We compared four different odorants (PEA, n-butanol, isoamyl butyrate, isobutanol) in an olfactory detection threshold task depending on subject population. Test odorants were applied to 73 healthy subjects. The experiment was divided into two sessions performed on two different days. The correlation coefficient between individual thresholds of PEA and n-butanol was not significant when exclusively normosmic subjects were included, but significant when additionally hyposmic, older subjects were studied. Comparable results were found for the analysis of the odorants n-butanol and isoamyl butyrate. Correlation between n-butanol and isobutanol was significant, both for exclusively normosmic, and additionally older, hyposmic subjects. The analyses of all other odorants revealed no significant correlations. Results give explanations for previous contradictory findings regarding investigations of PEA and n-butanol in a detection threshold task, and indicate that a formal validation of the Sniffin` Sticks with PEA as odorant is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21858265     DOI: 10.4193/Rhino10.263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  5 in total

1.  Conductive olfactory losses in chronic rhinosinusitis? A computational fluid dynamics study of 29 patients.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Jianbo Jiang; Edmund A Pribitkin; Pamela Dalton; David Rosen; Brian Lyman; Karen K Yee; Nancy E Rawson; Beverly J Cowart
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  SMELL-S and SMELL-R: Olfactory tests not influenced by odor-specific insensitivity or prior olfactory experience.

Authors:  Julien W Hsieh; Andreas Keller; Michele Wong; Rong-San Jiang; Leslie B Vosshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Scents in the stack: olfactometric proficiency testing with an emission simulation apparatus.

Authors:  Stephan Stöckel; Jens Cordes; Benno Stoffels; Dominik Wildanger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  A network model of affective odor perception.

Authors:  Yingxuan Liu; Alexander Toet; Tanja Krone; Robin van Stokkum; Sophia Eijsman; Jan B F van Erp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessment of odor hedonic perception: the Sniffin' sticks parosmia test (SSParoT).

Authors:  David T Liu; Antje Welge-Lüssen; Gerold Besser; Christian A Mueller; Bertold Renner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.