Literature DB >> 21857616

Comparison of neurological outcomes in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump beating heart coronary bypass, and off-pump coronary bypass.

Mostafa A Sabban1, Anjum Jalal, Bakir M Bakir, Ahmad A Alshaer, Osama A Abbas, Mohammed M Abdal-Aal, Yasser A Awadallah, Ahmed A Al-Saddique, Mohammed A Fouda.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the differences in the prevalence of neurological complications following coronary artery bypass (CAB) carried out by conventional, on-pump beating and off-pump techniques.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all isolated coronary bypass operations (n=127) performed in King Fahad Cardiac Center, Riyadh over a period of one year starting from January 2005. Out of 127 patients, 73 underwent conventional CAB graft (CABG), 33 patents on-pump beating heart coronary bypass, and 21 had off pump coronary bypass grafting (OPCAB). All patients had preoperative carotid scans and those who developed neurological complications underwent CT-brain and expert neuro-psychiatric assessment.
RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics of patients in all 3 groups were similar. The bypass times in the conventional CABG group were significantly longer than the on-pump beating group. The maximum number of grafts was in the on-pump beating group, followed by the conventional CABG, and the least in the OPCAB group. Seven out of 73 cases in the conventional bypass group developed neurological events of various severities. Only one out of 33 patients developed acute confusional state in the on-pump beating group and no neurological events were noticed in 21 patients operated by the OPCAB technique. Low ejection fraction, preoperative congestive cardiac failure, non-elective surgery and preoperative catastrophic state were found to be significant risk factors independent of the bypass technique.
CONCLUSION: This study shows no significant difference in the prevalence of neurological complications among different types of bypass surgery in our institution. There was a trend towards less neurological outcomes in the OPCAB and on-pump beating groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21857616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)        ISSN: 1319-6138            Impact factor:   0.906


  6 in total

1.  Anaortic total arterial OPCAB - Panacea to all ills?

Authors:  O P Yadava
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-06-13

2.  On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization-a propensity-matched comparison.

Authors:  Yashaskar Manjunatha Rao; Shreyas Potdar; Debasis Das; Atanu Saha; Lalit Kapoor; Mrinalendu Das; Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-10-06

3.  Beating-heart on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yefan Jiang; Li Xu; Yuqi Liu; Bowen Deng; Nianguo Dong; Si Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  On-pump beating heart versus conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Yefan Jiang; Xionggang Jiang; Si Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Assessment of risk factors for postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yongtao Sun; Hai Feng; Ting Zou; Ming Hou; Yanwu Jin; Changping Gu; Yuelan Wang; Juan Li; Mengjie Liu; Min Zhang; Yalei Gao
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Neurological complications are avoidable during CABG.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Haider; Anjum Jalal; Asif Rashid Alamgir; Irfan Rasheed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.