Literature DB >> 21857536

Low DBP may not be an independent risk for cardiovascular death in revascularized coronary artery disease patients.

Hisashi Kai1, Takafumi Ueno, Takeshi Kimura, Hisashi Adachi, Yutaka Furukawa, Toru Kita, Tsutomu Imaizumi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It remains controversial whether extremely low DBP is a risk for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary revascularization therapy became prevalent in CAD patients. We sought to determine the impact of low DBP on cardiovascular events and to investigate the predicting factors in revascularized CAD patients.
METHODS: We subanalyzed 7180 stable, chronic CAD patients (median follow-up period 3.6 years) of 9877 patients undergoing first coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention in the registry of the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome study in Kyoto (CREDO-Kyoto).
RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that unadjusted cumulative incidence of cardiovascular death was greater in patients with preprocedural DBP of less than 70 mmHg than in those with DBP of at least 70 mmHg, whereas the cumulative incidences of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and of stroke were similar between the two groups. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that estimated glomerular filtration ratio (inversely), pulse pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.40, history of heart failure, prior cerebrovascular disease, and prior MI were independent risks for cardiovascular death in patients with DBP of less than 70 mmHg. After adjustments for the independent risks, the cumulative hazard ratio for cardiovascular death did not differ between patients with DBP of less than 70 mmHg and those with DBP of at least 70 mmHg.
CONCLUSION: Renal insufficiency, more advanced vascular damage, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction were significant factors accounting for increased cardiovascular death in revascularized CAD patients with DBP of less than 70 mmHg. It was suggested that after adjustments for these independent risks, low DBP may not be a significant risk for cardiovascular death in revascularized CAD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21857536     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834a5a67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  3 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Hisashi Kai
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  [J curve: when lowering blood pressure becomes a hazard?].

Authors:  J Slany
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 3.  Blood pressure targets in the treatment of high blood pressure: a reappraisal of the J-shaped phenomenon.

Authors:  F D Fuchs; S C Fuchs
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.012

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.