Literature DB >> 23966174

Blood pressure targets in the treatment of high blood pressure: a reappraisal of the J-shaped phenomenon.

F D Fuchs1, S C Fuchs1.   

Abstract

The risk that lowering blood pressure (BP) excessively increases the incidence of cardiovascular disease-the J-shaped phenomenon-has been a matter of concern endorsed by many experts, particularly in patients with coronary heart disease and diabetes. The results of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes (ACCORD) trial strengthened the idea that it may be futile to lower BP more intensively in patients with diabetes. Nevertheless, there seems to be no direct J-shaped relation between BP-lowering treatment and outcome. Patients with normal or low BP and high or very high cardiovascular risk could have their BP reduced further by treatment. Placebo-controlled clinical trials of BP-lowering agents in patients with BP within normal values and concomitant cardiovascular disease demonstrated consistent reduction of recurrent and newer cardiovascular events. The use of BP agents in such conditions, as in patients with coronary artery disease, heart failure, diabetes and in patients recovered from a stroke has been endorsed by guidelines. Although is likely that there is a J-shaped relationship of BP with outcomes in cohort studies, clinical trials that tested more intensive versus standard goals and clinical trials done with patients with low BP demonstrated that the J-shaped phenomenon should not be a concern in the treatment of high BP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23966174     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2013.78

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  41 in total

1.  Blood pressure-lowering drugs: essential therapy for some patients with normal blood pressure.

Authors:  Flávio D Fuchs
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2004-09

2.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Yusuf; P Sleight; J Pogue; J Bosch; R Davies; G Dagenais
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A U-shaped association between home systolic blood pressure and four-year mortality in community-dwelling older men.

Authors:  K Okumiya; K Matsubayashi; T Wada; M Fujisawa; Y Osaki; Y Doi; N Yasuda; T Ozawa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Re-examination of some of the Framingham blood-pressure data.

Authors:  T W Anderson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effects of ramipril on cardiovascular and microvascular outcomes in people with diabetes mellitus: results of the HOPE study and MICRO-HOPE substudy. Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-22       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Association between blood pressure level and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and total mortality: the cardiovascular health study.

Authors:  B M Psaty; C D Furberg; L H Kuller; M Cushman; P J Savage; D Levine; D H O'Leary; R N Bryan; M Anderson; T Lumley
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-05-14

8.  Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS).

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Relation of reduction in pressure to first myocardial infarction in patients receiving treatment for severe hypertension.

Authors:  I M Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The J-curve phenomenon and the treatment of hypertension. Is there a point beyond which pressure reduction is dangerous?

Authors:  L Farnett; C D Mulrow; W D Linn; C R Lucey; M R Tuley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991 Jan 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical benefit of systolic blood pressure within the target range among patients with or without diabetes mellitus: a propensity score-matched analysis of two randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Chao Li; Kangyu Chen; Guoshuai Shi; Rui Shi; Zhenqiang Wu; Xiaodan Yuan; Vicky Watson; Zhixin Jiang; Hui Mai; Tian Yang; Duolao Wang; Tao Chen
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 11.150

2.  Cumulative mean arterial pressure and risks of adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: a prospective cohort study of 53,813 adults.

Authors:  Xiao Cui; Quanhui Zhao; Junxing Yu; Ruiying Zhang; Wei Li; Lu Song; Chunhui Li; Hualing Zhao; Aiping Wu; Shouling Wu; Jun Cai
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Summertime dosage-dependent hypersensitivity to an angiotensin II receptor blocker.

Authors:  Donald R Forsdyke
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 4.  Preventing the progression of prehypertension to hypertension: role of antihypertensives.

Authors:  Flávio Danni Fuchs; Renato Bandeira de Mello; Sandra Costa Fuchs
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Contemporary Cardiovascular Risk Assessment for Type 2 Diabetes Including Heart Failure as an Outcome: The Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II.

Authors:  Wendy A Davis; Valentina Hellbusch; Michael L Hunter; David G Bruce; Timothy M E Davis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.