BACKGROUND: The Performance Evaluation Program for HIV-1 incidence tests provided quality assurance services to laboratories conducting the serological testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion by use of a modified less-sensitive version of the Vironostika HIV-1 MicroElisa System assay. We report on the performance of the assay using proficiency testing and quality control materials tested from 2001 to 2008. METHODS: Two sets of 5 blinded serum panels using common calibration and quality control materials were tested. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation were calculated. Results were analyzed for misclassifications: false recent HIV infection errors (long-term infection classified as HIV infection less than 1 year), false long-term infection errors (HIV infection less than 1 year classified as long-term infection), and differences in standardized optical density means and variances over time. RESULTS: The false recent error rate was 1.26% (n = 2219). The false long-term error rate was 0.25% (n = 1618). No significant trends were observed for misclassification rates by year, and no significant trend in the standardized optical density over 7 years was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories using the less-sensitive Vironostika HIV-1 assay produced consistent results by use of a common calibrator and quality control materials.
BACKGROUND: The Performance Evaluation Program for HIV-1 incidence tests provided quality assurance services to laboratories conducting the serological testing algorithm for recent HIV seroconversion by use of a modified less-sensitive version of the Vironostika HIV-1 MicroElisa System assay. We report on the performance of the assay using proficiency testing and quality control materials tested from 2001 to 2008. METHODS: Two sets of 5 blinded serum panels using common calibration and quality control materials were tested. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation were calculated. Results were analyzed for misclassifications: false recent HIV infection errors (long-term infection classified as HIV infection less than 1 year), false long-term infection errors (HIV infection less than 1 year classified as long-term infection), and differences in standardized optical density means and variances over time. RESULTS: The false recent error rate was 1.26% (n = 2219). The false long-term error rate was 0.25% (n = 1618). No significant trends were observed for misclassification rates by year, and no significant trend in the standardized optical density over 7 years was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratories using the less-sensitive Vironostika HIV-1 assay produced consistent results by use of a common calibrator and quality control materials.
Authors: Ivana Parker; George Khalil; Amy Martin; Michael Martin; Suphak Vanichseni; Wanna Leelawiwat; Janet McNicholl; Andrew Hickey; J Gerardo García-Lerma; Kachit Choopanya; Kelly A Curtis Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Kelly A Curtis; Donna L Rudolph; Yi Pan; Kevin Delaney; Kathryn Anastos; Jack DeHovitz; Seble G Kassaye; Carl V Hanson; Audrey L French; Elizabeth Golub; Adaora A Adimora; Igho Ofotokun; Hector Bolivar; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Philip J Peters; William M Switzer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sheila M Keating; Wes Rountree; Eduard Grebe; Andrea L Pappas; Mars Stone; Dylan Hampton; Christopher A Todd; Marek S Poniewierski; Ana Sanchez; Cassandra G Porth; Thomas N Denny; Michael P Busch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240