PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model to differentiate between healthy and malignant prostate tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Regions of interest were drawn in healthy and cancerous tissue of 13 patients with histologically proven prostate carcinoma and fitted to a monoexponential model [yielding the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] and the IVIM signal equation (yielding the perfusion fraction f, the diffusion constant D and the pseudodiffusion coefficient of perfusion D⁎). Parameter maps were calculated for all parameters. RESULTS: The ADC, D and f were significantly (P<.005) lowered in cancerous tissue (1.01±0.22 μm(2)/ms, 0.84±0.19 μm(2)/ms and 14.27±7.10%, respectively) compared to benign tissue (1.49±0.17 μm(2)/ms, 1.21±0.22 μm(2)/ms and 21.25±8.32%, respectively). Parameter maps of D and f allowed for a delineation of the tumor, but showed higher variations compared to the ADC map. CONCLUSION: Apparent diffusion coefficient maps provide better diagnostic performance than IVIM maps for tumor detection. However, the results suggest that the reduction of the ADC in prostate cancer stems not only from changes in cellularity but also from perfusion effects. IVIM imaging might hold promise for the diagnosis of other prostatic lesions.
PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model to differentiate between healthy and malignant prostate tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Regions of interest were drawn in healthy and cancerous tissue of 13 patients with histologically proven prostate carcinoma and fitted to a monoexponential model [yielding the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)] and the IVIM signal equation (yielding the perfusion fraction f, the diffusion constant D and the pseudodiffusion coefficient of perfusion D⁎). Parameter maps were calculated for all parameters. RESULTS: The ADC, D and f were significantly (P<.005) lowered in cancerous tissue (1.01±0.22 μm(2)/ms, 0.84±0.19 μm(2)/ms and 14.27±7.10%, respectively) compared to benign tissue (1.49±0.17 μm(2)/ms, 1.21±0.22 μm(2)/ms and 21.25±8.32%, respectively). Parameter maps of D and f allowed for a delineation of the tumor, but showed higher variations compared to the ADC map. CONCLUSION: Apparent diffusion coefficient maps provide better diagnostic performance than IVIM maps for tumor detection. However, the results suggest that the reduction of the ADC in prostate cancer stems not only from changes in cellularity but also from perfusion effects. IVIM imaging might hold promise for the diagnosis of other prostatic lesions.
Authors: Filippo Pesapane; Francesca Patella; Enrico Maria Fumarola; Silvia Panella; Anna Maria Ierardi; Giovanni Guido Pompili; Giuseppe Franceschelli; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Alberto Magenta Biasina; Gianpaolo Carrafiello Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Lukas Filli; Moritz C Wurnig; Roger Luechinger; Christian Eberhardt; Roman Guggenberger; Andreas Boss Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Hauser; Marco Essig; Alexandra Jensen; Lars Gerigk; Frederik Bernd Laun; Marc Münter; Dirk Simon; Bram Stieltjes Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2013-02-17 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Raisa Z Freidlin; Harsh K Agarwal; Sandeep Sankineni; Anna M Brown; Francesca Mertan; Marcelino Bernardo; Dagane Daar; Maria Merino; Deborah Citrin; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Pelin Aksit Ciris; Jr-Yuan George Chiou; Daniel I Glazer; Tzu-Cheng Chao; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal; Bruno Madore; Stephan E Maier Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.016