Literature DB >> 21852029

Individual, study, and neighborhood level characteristics associated with peer recruitment of young illicit drug users in New York City: optimizing respondent driven sampling.

Abby E Rudolph1, Natalie D Crawford, Carl Latkin, Kellee White, Ebele O Benjamin, Kandice Jones, Crystal M Fuller.   

Abstract

Recruiting a representative sample using respondent driven sampling (RDS) relies on successful peer recruitment. While prior studies have identified individual-level characteristics associated with peer recruitment, study- and neighborhood-level factors may also influence peer recruitment. This analysis aimed to identify individual-, study-, and neighborhood-level factors associated with RDS peer recruitment. 390 young adult (18-40 years) heroin, crack and/or cocaine users in New York City (NYC) were recruited via RDS into a cohort study aiming to identify social risk factors for transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use (2006-2009). Individual-level baseline characteristics (demographics, drug use, and network characteristics) and study factors (number of recruitment coupons received and participant attendance at RDS training sessions (RDST) on peer recruitment) were ascertained. Aggregate measures of neighborhood attitudes about drug use, drug users, and HIV were obtained from a separate anonymous NYC resident random-digit-dialing survey (2002) and linked with baseline data by zip code. Descriptive statistics and multilevel modeling were used to identify factors associated with peer recruitment. After adjustment, recruiting each additional eligible peer recruit was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons, RDST attendance, and a greater proportion of community residents in one's recruitment neighborhood believing that clean needles should be made available to IDUs; heroin use was negatively associated with recruiting additional eligible peers. After adjustment, recruiting each additional peer (regardless of eligibility) was associated with receiving additional recruitment coupons and RDST attendance. Our data highlight the importance of neighborhood factors and suggest that RDS may not be as effective in areas characterized by negative attitudes about drug use. Group-facilitated recruitment training sessions may help counter negative social norms when implementing RDS in drug user studies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21852029      PMCID: PMC3171638          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

1.  Impact of the September 11th attacks in New York City on drug users: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Sherry Deren; Michele Shedlin; Thomas Hamilton; Holly Hagan
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment.

Authors:  Jichuan Wang; Robert G Carlson; Russel S Falck; Harvey A Siegal; Ahmmed Rahman; Linna Li
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Neighborhoods and health: where are we and were do we go from here?

Authors:  A-V Diez Roux
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.019

4.  Implementation challenges to using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance: field experiences in international settings.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Mohsen Malekinejad; Carl Kendall; Irene M Iuppa; George W Rutherford
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-06-06

Review 5.  Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Increased use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana among Manhattan, New York, residents after the September 11th terrorist attacks.

Authors:  David Vlahov; Sandro Galea; Heidi Resnick; Jennifer Ahern; Joseph A Boscarino; Michael Bucuvalas; Joel Gold; Dean Kilpatrick
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Nonmedical drug use among stimulant-using adults in small towns in rural Ohio.

Authors:  Russel S Falck; Harvey A Siegal; Jichuan Wang; Robert G Carlson; Paul J Draus
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2005-06

8.  Subpopulations of illicit drug users reached by targeted street outreach and respondent-driven sampling strategies: implications for research and public health practice.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; Natalie D Crawford; Carl Latkin; Robert Heimer; Ebele O Benjamin; Kandice C Jones; Crystal M Fuller
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  From networks to populations: the development and application of respondent-driven sampling among IDUs and Latino gay men.

Authors:  Jesus Ramirez-Valles; Douglas D Heckathorn; Raquel Vázquez; Rafael M Diaz; Richard T Campbell
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2005-12

10.  Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention.

Authors:  R S Broadhead; D D Heckathorn; D L Weakliem; D L Anthony; H Madray; R J Mills; J Hughes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Assessing the geographic coverage and spatial clustering of illicit drug users recruited through respondent-driven sampling in New York City.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; April M Young; Crystal Fuller Lewis
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Accuracy of name and age data provided about network members in a social network study of people who use drugs: implications for constructing sociometric networks.

Authors:  April M Young; Abby E Rudolph; Amanda E Su; Lee King; Susan Jent; Jennifer R Havens
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Financial and Emotional Support in Close Personal Ties among Central Asian Migrant Women in Russia.

Authors:  Olga Kornienko; Victor Agadjanian; Cecilia Menjívar; Natalia Zotova
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2017-05-24

4.  Participation and retention of youth with perinatal HIV infection in mental health research studies: the IMPAACT P1055 psychiatric comorbidity study.

Authors:  Paige L Williams; Miriam Chernoff; Konstantia Angelidou; Pim Brouwers; Deborah Kacanek; Nagamah S Deygoo; Sharon Nachman; Kenneth D Gadow
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Characteristics and health service utilization in two samples of young injection drug users recruited using direct and referral methods in San Francisco, California.

Authors:  Alya Briceño; Meghan D Morris; Jennifer Evans; H Fisher Raymond; Kimberly Page
Journal:  J Alcohol Drug Depend       Date:  2013-08

6.  The importance of measuring and accounting for potential biases in respondent-driven samples.

Authors:  Abby E Rudolph; Crystal M Fuller; Carl Latkin
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2013-07

7.  Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Factors Among Somali Immigrants and Refugees.

Authors:  Bjorn Westgard; Brian C Martinson; Michael Maciosek; Morgan Brown; Zhiyuan Xu; Farhiya Farah; Osman Ahmed; Ahmed Dalmar; Diana Dubois; Laura Sanka; Douglas Pryce
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2020-09-17

8.  Multiple strategies to identify HIV-positive black men who have sex with men and transgender women in New York City: a cross-sectional analysis of recruitment results.

Authors:  Julie Franks; Sharon B Mannheimer; Yael Hirsch-Moverman; Eleanor Hayes-Larson; Paul W Colson; Hugo Ortega; Wafaa M El-Sadr
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.396

9.  Descriptive Aspects of Injection Drug Users in Iran's National Harm Reduction Program by Methadone Maintenance Treatment.

Authors:  Sharareh Eskandarieh; Ali Nikfarjam; Termeh Tarjoman; Abassali Nasehi; Firoozeh Jafari; Mohammad-Bagher Saberi-Zafarghandi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 1.429

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.