OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the use of cluster analysis for identifying sub-populations of complex patients who may benefit from targeted care management strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: We identified a cohort of adult members of an integrated health maintenance organization who had 2 or more of 17 common chronic medical conditions and were categorized in the top 20% of total cost of care for 2 consecutive years (n = 15,480). We used agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods to identify clinically relevant subgroups based on groupings of coexisting conditions. Ward's minimum variance algorithm provided the most parsimonious solution. RESULTS: Ward's algorithm identified 10 clinically relevant clusters grouped around single or multiple "anchoring conditions." The clusters revealed distinct groups of patients including: coexisting chronic pain and mental illness, obesity and mental illness, frail elderly, cancer, specific surgical procedures, cardiac disease, chronic lung disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, diabetes, and renal disease. These conditions co-occurred with multiple other chronic conditions. Mental health diagnoses were prevalent (range 28% to 100%) in all clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Data mining procedures such as cluster analysis can be used to identify discrete groups of patients with specific combinations of comorbid conditions. These clusters suggest the need for a range of care management strategies. Although several of our clusters lend themselves to existing care and disease management protocols, care management for other subgroups is less well-defined. Cluster analysis methods can be leveraged to develop targeted care management interventions designed to improve health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To illustrate the use of cluster analysis for identifying sub-populations of complex patients who may benefit from targeted care management strategies. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. METHODS: We identified a cohort of adult members of an integrated health maintenance organization who had 2 or more of 17 common chronic medical conditions and were categorized in the top 20% of total cost of care for 2 consecutive years (n = 15,480). We used agglomerative hierarchical clustering methods to identify clinically relevant subgroups based on groupings of coexisting conditions. Ward's minimum variance algorithm provided the most parsimonious solution. RESULTS: Ward's algorithm identified 10 clinically relevant clusters grouped around single or multiple "anchoring conditions." The clusters revealed distinct groups of patients including: coexisting chronic pain and mental illness, obesity and mental illness, frail elderly, cancer, specific surgical procedures, cardiac disease, chronic lung disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, diabetes, and renal disease. These conditions co-occurred with multiple other chronic conditions. Mental health diagnoses were prevalent (range 28% to 100%) in all clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Data mining procedures such as cluster analysis can be used to identify discrete groups of patients with specific combinations of comorbid conditions. These clusters suggest the need for a range of care management strategies. Although several of our clusters lend themselves to existing care and disease management protocols, care management for other subgroups is less well-defined. Cluster analysis methods can be leveraged to develop targeted care management interventions designed to improve health outcomes.
Authors: Brian W Powers; Jiali Yan; Jingsan Zhu; Kristin A Linn; Sachin H Jain; Jennifer L Kowalski; Amol S Navathe Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jiali Yan; Kristin A Linn; Brian W Powers; Jingsan Zhu; Sachin H Jain; Jennifer L Kowalski; Amol S Navathe Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Ali Ajdari; Linda Ng Boyle; Nithya Kannan; Ali Rowhani-Rahbar; Jin Wang; Richard Mink; Benjamin Ries; Mark Wainwright; Jonathan I Groner; Michael J Bell; Chris Giza; Douglas F Zatzick; Richard G Ellenbogen; Pamela H Mitchell; Frederick P Rivara; Monica S Vavilala Journal: J Healthc Qual Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 1.095
Authors: Michael A Steinman; Sei J Lee; W John Boscardin; Yinghui Miao; Kathy Z Fung; Kelly L Moore; Janice B Schwartz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: A Calderón-Larrañaga; D L Vetrano; L Ferrucci; S W Mercer; A Marengoni; G Onder; M Eriksdotter; L Fratiglioni Journal: J Intern Med Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Karen Abernathy; Jingwen Zhang; Patrick Mauldin; William Moran; Mac Abernathy; Elisha Brownfield; Kimberly Davis Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2016-06-24