Literature DB >> 21850689

Computed tomography liver volumetry using 3-dimensional image data in living donor liver transplantation: effects of the slice thickness on the volume calculation.

Masatoshi Hori1, Kenji Suzuki, Mark L Epstein, Richard L Baron.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the slice thickness and the calculated volume in computed tomography (CT) liver volumetry through the comparison of the results from images [including 3-dimensional (3D) images] with various slice thicknesses. Twenty potential adult liver donors (12 men and 8 women) with a mean age of 39 years (range = 24-64 years) underwent CT with a 64-section multidetector row CT scanner after the intravenous injection of a contrast material. Four image sets with slice thicknesses of 0.625, 2.5, 5, and 10 mm were used. First, a program developed in our laboratory for automated liver extraction was applied to the CT images, and the liver boundaries were determined automatically. Then, an abdominal radiologist reviewed all images onto which automatically extracted boundaries had been superimposed and then edited the boundaries on each slice to enhance the accuracy. The liver volumes were determined via the counting of the voxels within the liver boundaries. The mean whole liver volumes estimated with CT were 1322.5 cm(3) from 0.625-mm images, 1313.3 cm(3) from 2.5-mm images, 1310.3 cm(3) from 5-mm images, and 1268.2 cm(3) from 10-mm images. The volumes calculated from 3D (0.625-mm) images were significantly larger than the volumes calculated from thicker images (P < 0.001). The partial liver volumes of right lobes, left lobes, and lateral segments were evaluated in a similar manner. The estimated maximum difference in the calculated volumes of lateral segments was -10.9 cm(3) (-4.63%) between 0.625- and 5-mm images. In conclusion, liver volumes calculated from 2.5-mm-thick or thicker images are significantly smaller than liver volumes calculated from 3D images. If a maximum error of 5% in the calculated graft volume will not have a significant clinical impact, 5-mm-thick images are acceptable for CT volumetry. If the impact is significant, 3D images could be essential.
Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21850689      PMCID: PMC3226887          DOI: 10.1002/lt.22419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  22 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Measurement of liver volume using spiral CT and the curved line and cubic spline algorithms: reproducibility and interobserver variation.

Authors:  K Sandrasegaran; P W Kwo; D DiGirolamo; S M Stockberger; O W Cummings; K K Kopecky
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

3.  Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography.

Authors:  S B Heymsfield; T Fulenwider; B Nordlinger; R Barlow; P Sones; M Kutner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Preoperative measurement of segmental liver volume of donors for living related liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Kawasaki; M Makuuchi; H Matsunami; Y Hashikura; T Ikegami; H Chisuwa; T Ikeno; T Noike; T Takayama; H Kawarazaki
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.

Authors:  Laurent Hermoye; Ismael Laamari-Azjal; Zhujiang Cao; Laurence Annet; Jan Lerut; Benoit M Dawant; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors.

Authors:  T Kiuchi; M Kasahara; K Uryuhara; Y Inomata; S Uemoto; K Asonuma; H Egawa; S Fujita; M Hayashi; K Tanaka
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation.

Authors:  K Urata; S Kawasaki; H Matsunami; Y Hashikura; T Ikegami; S Ishizone; Y Momose; A Komiyama; M Makuuchi
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Accurate preoperative estimation of liver-graft volumetry using three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Shoji Hiroshige; Mitsuo Shimada; Noboru Harada; Satoko Shiotani; Mizuki Ninomiya; Ryousuke Minagawa; Yuji Soejima; Taketoshi Suehiro; Hiroshi Honda; Makoto Hashizume; Keizo Sugimachi
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  CT slice index and thickness: impact on organ contouring in radiation treatment planning for prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Berthelet; M Liu; P Truong; P Czaykowski; N Kalach; C Yu; K Patterson; T Currie; S Kristensen; W Kwan; V Moravan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  9 in total

1.  Nomogram for individualised prediction of liver failure risk after hepatectomy in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the evidence from ultrasound data.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Hong Han; Xi Kun Han; Wen Ping Wang; Hong Ding
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Mirko D'Onofrio; Riccardo De Robertis; Emanuele Demozzi; Stefano Crosara; Stefano Canestrini; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-28

3.  Three-Dimensional Volumetric Assessment of Graft Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Does It Minimise Errors of Estimation?

Authors:  Nihar Mohapatra; Kishore Gurumoorthy Subramanya Bharathy; Piyush Kumar Sinha; Shridhar Vasantrao Sasturkar; Yashwant Patidar; Viniyendra Pamecha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-26

4.  Is it possible to estimate volume of bone defects formed on dry sheep mandibles more practically by secondarily reconstructing section thickness of cone beam computed tomography images?

Authors:  Alaettin Koç; Sema Kaya
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Stereology: a novel technique for rapid assessment of liver volume.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Agneta Norén; Joel Kullberg
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2012-05-03

6.  The Use of a 3D Printing Model in Planning a Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation: First in India.

Authors:  Karthik K Raichurkar; Rajiv Lochan; Mathew Jacob; Sonal Asthana
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2020-08-19

7.  Accuracy of estimation of graft size for living-related liver transplantation: first results of a semi-automated interactive software for CT-volumetry.

Authors:  Theresa Mokry; Nadine Bellemann; Dirk Müller; Justo Lorenzo Bermejo; Miriam Klauß; Ulrike Stampfl; Boris Radeleff; Peter Schemmer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christof-Matthias Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of liver volumetry on contrast-enhanced CT images: one semiautomatic and two automatic approaches.

Authors:  Wei Cai; Baochun He; Yingfang Fan; Chihua Fang; Fucang Jia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Semi-automated computed tomography Volumetry can predict hemihepatectomy specimens' volumes in patients with hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Philipp Mayer; Martin Grözinger; Theresa Mokry; Peter Schemmer; Nina Waldburger; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Miriam Klauss; Christof-Matthias Sommer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 1.930

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.