Literature DB >> 21849618

Task goals influence online corrections and adaptation of reaching movements.

John E Schlerf1, Richard B Ivry.   

Abstract

Everyday movements often have multiple solutions. Many of these solutions arise from biomechanical redundancies. Often, however, the goal does not require a unique movement. To examine how people exploit task-related redundancy, we observed as participants produced three-dimensional (3-D) reaching movements, moving to one of two rectangular targets that were diagonally oriented in the frontal (x, y) plane. On most trials, the movement was perturbed by a vertical, velocity-dependent force. Since participants were free to move in 3-D space, online corrections could involve movement along the perturbed, vertical dimension, as well as the nonperturbed, horizontal dimension. If the motor system exploits task redundancies, then corrections along the horizontal dimension should depend on the orientation of the target. Consistent with this prediction, participants modified both the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the trajectory over the course of learning, and the horizontal component was sensitive to the orientation of the target. Furthermore, participants produced online corrections with a horizontal component that brought the hand closer to the target. These results suggest that we not only correct for mismatches between expected and experienced forces but also exploit task-specific redundancies to efficiently improve performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849618      PMCID: PMC3214111          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00301.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  25 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement.

Authors:  Hermann Müller; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements.

Authors:  Julia Trommershäuser; Laurence T Maloney; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: theory and experiments in human motor control.

Authors:  Opher Donchin; Joseph T Francis; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P Dizio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Multisensory integration during motor planning.

Authors:  Samuel J Sober; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  5 in total

1.  Long-latency muscle activity reflects continuous, delayed sensorimotor feedback of task-level and not joint-level error.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Energy margins in dynamic object manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher J Hasson; Tian Shen; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Locomotor control of limb force switches from minimal intervention principle in early adaptation to noise reduction in late adaptation.

Authors:  Brian P Selgrade; Young-Hui Chang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Trial-to-trial dynamics and learning in a generalized, redundant reaching task.

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Rachel F Smallwood; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Sensorimotor control of tracking movements at various speeds for stroke patients as well as age-matched and young healthy subjects.

Authors:  Di Ao; Rong Song; Kai-Yu Tong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.