Literature DB >> 21849318

Multi-objective optimization shapes ecological variation.

Pekka Kaitaniemi1, Annette Scheiner, Tero Klemola, Kai Ruohomäki.   

Abstract

Ecological systems contain a huge amount of quantitative variation between and within species and locations, which makes it difficult to obtain unambiguous verification of theoretical predictions. Ordinary experiments consider just a few explanatory factors and are prone to providing oversimplified answers because they ignore the complexity of the factors that underlie variation. We used multi-objective optimization (MO) for a mechanistic analysis of the potential ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences of variation in the life-history traits of a species of moth. Optimal life-history solutions were sought for environmental conditions where different life stages of the moth were subject to predation and other known fitness-reducing factors in a manner that was dependent on the duration of these life stages and on variable mortality rates. We found that multi-objective optimal solutions to these conditions that the moths regularly experience explained most of the life-history variation within this species. Our results demonstrate that variation can have a causal interpretation even for organisms under steady conditions. The results suggest that weather and species interactions can act as underlying causes of variation, and MO acts as a corresponding adaptive mechanism that maintains variation in the traits of organisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21849318      PMCID: PMC3248741          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  10 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of growth trajectories: what limits growth rate?

Authors:  Caitlin M Dmitriew
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-02

2.  Climate-driven population divergence in sex-determining systems.

Authors:  Ido Pen; Tobias Uller; Barbara Feldmeyer; Anna Harts; Geoffrey M While; Erik Wapstra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now?

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  The evolution of trade-offs: where are we?

Authors:  D A Roff; D J Fairbairn
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 5.  Fine-Tuning Plant Defence Signalling: Salicylate versus Jasmonate.

Authors:  G J M Beckers; S H Spoel
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.081

6.  Alternative designs and the evolution of functional diversity.

Authors:  Christian O Marks; Martin J Lechowicz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  The evolutionary ecology of individual phenotypic plasticity in wild populations.

Authors:  D H Nussey; A J Wilson; J E Brommer
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Genetic divergence and fitness convergence under uniform selection in experimental populations of bacteria.

Authors:  R Korona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  The theory of games and the evolution of animal conflicts.

Authors:  J M Smith
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Reduction in size and fecundity of the autumnal moth, Epirrita autumnata, in the increase phase of a population cycle.

Authors:  Tero Klemola; Kai Ruohomäki; Tommi Andersson; Seppo Neuvonen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 3.225

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.