Literature DB >> 16701424

Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now?

Massimo Pigliucci1.   

Abstract

The study of phenotypic plasticity has progressed significantly over the past few decades. We have moved from variation for plasticity being considered as a nuisance in evolutionary studies to it being the primary target of investigations that use an array of methods, including quantitative and molecular genetics, as well as of several approaches that model the evolution of plastic responses. Here, I consider some of the major aspects of research on phenotypic plasticity, assessing where progress has been made and where additional effort is required. I suggest that some areas of research, such the study of the quantitative genetic underpinning of plasticity, have been either settled in broad outline or superseded by new approaches and questions. Other issues, such as the costs of plasticity are currently at the forefront of research in this field, and are likely to be areas of major future development.

Year:  2005        PMID: 16701424     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  202 in total

1.  The potential of plant viruses to promote genotypic diversity via genotype x environment interactions.

Authors:  Tamara van Mölken; Josef F Stuefer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Epigenetic variation in plant responses to defence hormones.

Authors:  Vít Latzel; Yuanye Zhang; Kim Karlsson Moritz; Markus Fischer; Oliver Bossdorf
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework.

Authors:  Marcel E Visser; Samuel P Caro; Kees van Oers; Sonja V Schaper; Barbara Helm
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Trade-offs limiting the evolution of coloniality: ecological displacement rates used to measure small costs.

Authors:  Kiyoko Yokota; Robert W Sterner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Detection of a gravitropism phenotype in glutamate receptor-like 3.3 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana using machine vision and computation.

Authors:  Nathan D Miller; Tessa L Durham Brooks; Amir H Assadi; Edgar P Spalding
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Contrasting environments shape thermal physiology across the spatial range of the sandhopper Talorchestia capensis.

Authors:  Simone Baldanzi; Nicolas F Weidberg; Marco Fusi; Stefano Cannicci; Christopher D McQuaid; Francesca Porri
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Ontogenetic changes in genetic variances of age-dependent plasticity along a latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  V Nilsson-Örtman; B Rogell; R Stoks; F Johansson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Early growth conditions, phenotypic development and environmental change.

Authors:  Pat Monaghan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Early hatching enhances survival despite beneficial phenotypic effects of late-season developmental environments.

Authors:  P R Pearson; D A Warner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.