Literature DB >> 2184859

Sutures, staplers, leaks and strictures. A review of anastomoses in oesophageal resection at Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast 1977-1986.

K G McManus1, A J Ritchie, J McGuigan, H M Stevenson, J R Gibbons.   

Abstract

Leakage from an oesophagogastric anastomosis has a high morbidity and mortality. Recent evidence suggests that mechanical tissue stapling devices can decrease the rate of anastomotic breakdown but at the expense of an increase in the occurrence of fibrotic strictures at the anastomosis site. This study examines the rate of leakage and stricture in hand sutured and stapled anastomoses. A retrospective study was made of 221 oesophagogastric anastomoses following resection for carcinoma between 1977 and 1986. There were 122 sutured and 99 stapled anastomoses. Leak occurred in 21 sutured (17.2%) and 7 stapled (7.1%), P less than 0.05. If the stapled anastomosis was completely satisfactory and required no reinforcing sutures, the breakdown rate was in fact only 3% (2/69), P less than 0.01. A stapled anastomosis which required reinforcement had a similar chance of breakdown as a sutured anastomosis (16.7%). There was little difference in the performance of registrars in training and consultants at hand-sewn anastomoses with leakage rates of 13.7% and 18%, respectively; P greater than 0.05. The registrars, however, did not improve with the use of the stapler with a leakage rate of 14.3% compared to the consultants' rate of 1.75%, P less than 0.05. Involvement of the limits of resection with tumour slightly favoured breakdown--15.5% compared to 11.6% if the limits were free from tumour, P greater than 0.05. The incidence of malignant strictures was similar in both groups but benign stricture was more common in the stapled group--13% (13/99) compared to 1.6% (2/122), P less than 0.01. The mechanical stapler brings uniformity to the anastomosis but cannot compensate for deficiencies in surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2184859     DOI: 10.1016/1010-7940(90)90222-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  [Using a surgical stapler on the gastrointestinal tract--pro and contra].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; J R Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Is hand sewing comparable with stapling for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Quan-Xing Liu; Jia-Xin Min; Xu-Feng Deng; Ji-Gang Dai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Useful strategies to prevent severe stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasm.

Authors:  Kaname Uno; Katsunori Iijima; Tomoyuki Koike; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  The changing face of oesophageal cancer treatment in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  K McManus; J McGuigan
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1994-10

7.  Multicenter prospective evaluation of a new articulating 5-mm endoscopic linear stapler.

Authors:  Andreas Kuthe; Alexander Haemmerle; Kaja Ludwig; Stephan Falck; Wolfgang Hiller; Frederick Mainik; Stephan Freys; Lev Dubovoy; Joachim Jaehne; Karl Oldhafer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Anastomotic techniques for oesophagectomy for malignancy: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  S K Kamarajah; J R Bundred; P Singh; S Pasquali; E A Griffiths
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-05-23

Review 9.  Surgical stapling device-tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes.

Authors:  Edward Chekan; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-09-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.