Literature DB >> 21847740

Getting it right: are regulation and registries for CT radiation dose in children the answer?

Marilyn J Goske1.   

Abstract

Recently, the state of California enacted a law requiring radiologists to record the radiation dose that each patient receives for a CT scan. Failure to do so is penalized by law. This law becomes effective in July 2012. By July 2013, every facility that performs CT scans must become accredited by one of three professional groups. This report discusses the role that legislation is playing in the practice of medicine in regard to CT practice. Inherent in this discussion is the assumption that pediatric radiologists know the right dose that a child should receive for a specific clinical indication. But do we really know the answer to this? Compared to the European radiology community, the United States radiology community lags in this regard. This paper defines diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and reviews the history of DRL in the United States compared to that in the European community and the progress by the American College of Radiology's National Radiology Data Registry (NRDR) to establish national registries. The establishment of the first pediatric Quality Improvement Registry in CT Scans in Children (QuIRCC) and its progress to date will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21847740     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-011-2105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  13 in total

1.  Has the mammography quality standards act affected the mammography quality in North Carolina?

Authors:  E D Pisano; M Schell; J Rollins; C B Burns; B Hall; Y Lin; M P Braeuning; E Burke; J Holliday
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Is computed tomography safe?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate?

Authors:  David J Brenner; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Shattuck lecture. Innovation, regulation, and the FDA.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  CT scanning the early days.

Authors:  E C Beckmann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Authors:  E Stephen Amis; Priscilla F Butler; Kimberly E Applegate; Steven B Birnbaum; Libby F Brateman; James M Hevezi; Fred A Mettler; Richard L Morin; Michael J Pentecost; Geoffrey G Smith; Keith J Strauss; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The Image Gently campaign: working together to change practice.

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske; Kimberly E Applegate; Jennifer Boylan; Priscilla F Butler; Michael J Callahan; Brian D Coley; Shawn Farley; Donald P Frush; Marta Hernanz-Schulman; Diego Jaramillo; Neil D Johnson; Sue C Kaste; Greg Morrison; Keith J Strauss; Nora Tuggle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Ferid Shannoun; Maria Blettner; Heinz Schmidberger; Hajo Zeeb
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?

Authors:  A Paterson; D P Frush; L F Donnelly
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  Reply to commentary--'CT radiation dose reduction: can we do harm by doing good?'.

Authors:  Beverley Newman; Michael J Callahan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Falling prey to the sunk cost bias: a potential harm of patient radiation dose histories.

Authors:  Jonathan D Eisenberg; H Benjamin Harvey; Donald A Moore; G Scott Gazelle; Pari V Pandharipande
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 11.105

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.