Literature DB >> 19633752

Radiation protection in diagnostic radiology.

Ferid Shannoun1, Maria Blettner, Heinz Schmidberger, Hajo Zeeb.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of ionizing radiation is regulated by legislative bodies to limit both individuals' and the population's exposure to radiation. Germany has implemented the European 97/43/EURATOM directive in national law by updating the existing radiation protection regulations. The German Commission on Radiological Protection regularly publishes statements and recommendations on radiation protection in medicine and diagnostic radiology, such as the introduction of diagnostic reference levels and referral guidelines for radiological and nuclear medicine imaging.
METHODS: Review of selected literature, national and international recommendations and legal texts.
RESULTS: From a radiological protection perspective, clear justification for radiological examinations and techniques aimed at minimizing radiation dose while providing the required diagnostic information, are essential. DISCUSSION: Referring doctors should be sure to use existing guidelines for medical imaging, and liaise with radiologists and nuclear medicine specialists, with whom they share the responsibility for choosing appropriate imaging modalities.

Keywords:  Directive 97/43/EURATOM; German Commission on Radiological Protection; radiation dosimetry; radiation protection in medicine; radiation risk

Year:  2008        PMID: 19633752      PMCID: PMC2696677          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


  10 in total

1.  [CT radiation exposure risk in Germany].

Authors:  M Galanski; H D Nagel; G Stamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-10

2.  [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].

Authors:  H P Busch; S Busch; C Decker; C Schilz
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2003-01

Review 3.  National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients.

Authors:  Otha W Linton; Fred A Mettler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de González; Sarah Darby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  [Determination of the effective dose for CT examinations and influence of the setup parameters].

Authors:  F Koller; J Roth
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2007-01

6.  Medical exposure of the population from diagnostic use of ionizing radiation in luxembourg between 1994 and 2002.

Authors:  Ferid Shannoun; Hajo Zeeb; Carlo Back; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 7.  [Radiation exposure of patients from diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures. Facts, assessment and trends].

Authors:  G Brix; E Nekolla; J Griebel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Evolution of diagnostic radiology in a big hospital during a 5 year period, and the derived collective dose.

Authors:  E Vañó; A Velasco; P Morán; L González; C S Alvarez Pedrosa
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Effective doses to members of the public from the diagnostic application of ionizing radiation in Germany.

Authors:  A Kaul; B Bauer; J Bernhardt; D Nosske; R Veit
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  [Survey of CT practice in Japan and collective effective dose estimation].

Authors:  Kanae Nishizawa; Masaki Matsumoto; Kazuo Iwai; Takashi Maruyama
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2004-03
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  [Efficacy of x-ray assessment in emergency surgical departments: an evaluation in a level I trauma center].

Authors:  O Ackermann; A Wetter; E Chelangattucherry; I Emmanouilidis; C Rülander
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Mechanical obstruction as a cause of acute abdomen. Radiological differential diagnosis].

Authors:  M Körner; U Linsenmaier; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Radiation Safety in Nuclear Medicine Procedures.

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Jahae Kim; Ho-Chun Song
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-02-19

Review 4.  Getting it right: are regulation and registries for CT radiation dose in children the answer?

Authors:  Marilyn J Goske
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

5.  Radiation protection in pediatric radiology.

Authors:  Gerhard Alzen; Gabriele Benz-Bohm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 6.  Prosthetic Consideration in Implant-supported Prosthesis: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Manga Snigdha Gowd; Thatapudi Shankar; Rajeev Ranjan; Arpita Singh
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-06-20

7.  Less hip range of motion is associated with a greater alpha angle in people with longstanding hip and groin pain.

Authors:  August Estberger; Anders Pålsson; Ioannis Kostogiannis; Eva Ageberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.