BACKGROUND: Current criteria for assessing treatment response of invasive aspergillosis (IA) rely on nonspecific subjective parameters. We hypothesized that an Aspergillus-specific response definition based on the kinetics of serum Aspergillus galactomannan index (GMI) would provide earlier and more objective response assessment. METHODS: We compared the 6-week European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) response criteria with GMI-based response among 115 cancer patients with IA. Success according to GMI required survival with repeatedly negative GMI for ≥2 weeks. Time to response and agreement between the 2 definitions were the study endpoints. RESULTS: Success according to EORTC/MSG and GMI criteria was observed in 73 patients (63%) and 83 patients (72%), respectively. The GMI-based response was determined at a median of 21 days after treatment initiation (range, 15-41 days), 3 weeks before the EORTC/MSG time point, in 72 (87%) of 83 responders. Agreement between definitions was shown in all 32 nonresponders and in 73 of the 83 responders (91% overall), with an excellent κ correlation coefficient of 0.819. Among 10 patients with discordant response (EORTC/MSG failure, GMI success), 1 is alive without IA 3 years after diagnosis; for the other, aspergillosis could not be detected at autopsy. The presence of other life-threatening complications in the remaining 8 patients indicates that IA had resolved. CONCLUSIONS: The Aspergillus-specific GMI-based criteria compare favorably to current response definitions for IA and significantly shorten time to response assessment. These criteria rely on a simple, reproducible, objective, and Aspergillus-specific test and should serve as the primary endpoint in trials of IA.
BACKGROUND: Current criteria for assessing treatment response of invasive aspergillosis (IA) rely on nonspecific subjective parameters. We hypothesized that an Aspergillus-specific response definition based on the kinetics of serum Aspergillus galactomannan index (GMI) would provide earlier and more objective response assessment. METHODS: We compared the 6-week European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) response criteria with GMI-based response among 115 cancerpatients with IA. Success according to GMI required survival with repeatedly negative GMI for ≥2 weeks. Time to response and agreement between the 2 definitions were the study endpoints. RESULTS: Success according to EORTC/MSG and GMI criteria was observed in 73 patients (63%) and 83 patients (72%), respectively. The GMI-based response was determined at a median of 21 days after treatment initiation (range, 15-41 days), 3 weeks before the EORTC/MSG time point, in 72 (87%) of 83 responders. Agreement between definitions was shown in all 32 nonresponders and in 73 of the 83 responders (91% overall), with an excellent κ correlation coefficient of 0.819. Among 10 patients with discordant response (EORTC/MSG failure, GMI success), 1 is alive without IA 3 years after diagnosis; for the other, aspergillosis could not be detected at autopsy. The presence of other life-threatening complications in the remaining 8 patients indicates that IA had resolved. CONCLUSIONS: The Aspergillus-specific GMI-based criteria compare favorably to current response definitions for IA and significantly shorten time to response assessment. These criteria rely on a simple, reproducible, objective, and Aspergillus-specific test and should serve as the primary endpoint in trials of IA.
Authors: Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Alia A Sarafandi; Amy M Kelaher; Caron A Lyman; Heather E Casler; Tin Sein; Andreas H Groll; John Bacher; Nilo A Avila; Thomas J Walsh Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Ruta Petraitiene; Vidmantas Petraitis; Andreas H Groll; Tin Sein; Robert L Schaufele; Andrea Francesconi; John Bacher; Nilo A Avila; Thomas J Walsh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: R Petraitiene; V Petraitis; A H Groll; T Sein; S Piscitelli; M Candelario; A Field-Ridley; N Avila; J Bacher; T J Walsh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Raoul Herbrecht; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; John E Bennett; Reginald E Greene; Jörg-W Oestmann; Winfried V Kern; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Ribaud; Olivier Lortholary; Richard Sylvester; Robert H Rubin; John R Wingard; Paul Stark; Christine Durand; Denis Caillot; Eckhard Thiel; Pranatharthi H Chandrasekar; Michael R Hodges; Haran T Schlamm; Peter F Troke; Ben de Pauw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kieren A Marr; S Arunmozhi Balajee; Lisa McLaughlin; Marc Tabouret; Christopher Bentsen; Thomas J Walsh Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Louis Y A Chai; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Elizabeth M Johnson; Steven Teerenstra; Lay Wai Khin; Alieke G Vonk; Johan Maertens; Olivier Lortholary; Peter J Donnelly; Haran T Schlamm; Peter F Troke; Mihai G Netea; Raoul Herbrecht Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Silke Gastine; William Hope; Georg Hempel; Ruta Petraitiene; Vidmantas Petraitis; Diana Mickiene; John Bacher; Thomas J Walsh; Andreas H Groll Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Matthew W McCarthy; Laura L Kovanda; Myo H Zaw; Kaiser Hussain; Naima Shaikh; Bo Bo W Maung; Navjot K Sekhon; William W Hope; Thomas J Walsh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-08-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Thomas F Patterson; George R Thompson; David W Denning; Jay A Fishman; Susan Hadley; Raoul Herbrecht; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Kieren A Marr; Vicki A Morrison; M Hong Nguyen; Brahm H Segal; William J Steinbach; David A Stevens; Thomas J Walsh; John R Wingard; Jo-Anne H Young; John E Bennett Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 9.079