OBJECTIVE: Health information exchange (HIE) systems are being developed across the nation. Understanding approaches taken by existing successful exchanges can help new exchange efforts determine goals and plan implementations. The goal of this study was to explore characteristics of use and users of a successful regional HIE. DESIGN: We used a mixed-method analysis, consisting of cross-sectional audit log data, semi-structured interviews, and direct observation in a sample of emergency departments and ambulatory safety net clinics actively using HIE. For each site, we measured overall usage trends, user logon statistics, and data types accessed by users. We also assessed reasons for use and outcomes of use. RESULTS: Overall, users accessed HIE for 6.8% of all encounters, with higher rates of access for repeat visits, for patients with comorbidities, for patients known to have data in the exchange, and at sites providing HIE access to both nurses and physicians. Discharge summaries and test reports were the most frequently accessed data in the exchange. Providers consistently noted retrieving additional history, preventing repeat tests, comparing new results to retrieved results, and avoiding hospitalizations as a consequence of HIE access. CONCLUSION: HIE use in emergency departments and ambulatory clinics was focused on patients where missing information was believed to be present in the exchange and was related to factors including the roles of people with access, the setting, and other site-specific issues that impacted the overall breadth of routine system use. These data should form an important foundation as other sites embark upon HIE implementation.
OBJECTIVE: Health information exchange (HIE) systems are being developed across the nation. Understanding approaches taken by existing successful exchanges can help new exchange efforts determine goals and plan implementations. The goal of this study was to explore characteristics of use and users of a successful regional HIE. DESIGN: We used a mixed-method analysis, consisting of cross-sectional audit log data, semi-structured interviews, and direct observation in a sample of emergency departments and ambulatory safety net clinics actively using HIE. For each site, we measured overall usage trends, user logon statistics, and data types accessed by users. We also assessed reasons for use and outcomes of use. RESULTS: Overall, users accessed HIE for 6.8% of all encounters, with higher rates of access for repeat visits, for patients with comorbidities, for patients known to have data in the exchange, and at sites providing HIE access to both nurses and physicians. Discharge summaries and test reports were the most frequently accessed data in the exchange. Providers consistently noted retrieving additional history, preventing repeat tests, comparing new results to retrieved results, and avoiding hospitalizations as a consequence of HIE access. CONCLUSION: HIE use in emergency departments and ambulatory clinics was focused on patients where missing information was believed to be present in the exchange and was related to factors including the roles of people with access, the setting, and other site-specific issues that impacted the overall breadth of routine system use. These data should form an important foundation as other sites embark upon HIE implementation.
Authors: Kevin B Johnson; Cindy S Gadd; Dominik Aronsky; Kevin Yang; Lianhong Tang; Vicki Estrin; Janet K King; Mark Frisse Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2008-11-06
Authors: Mark E Frisse; Janet K King; Will B Rice; Lianhong Tang; Jameson P Porter; Timothy A Coffman; Michael Assink; Kevin Yang; Monroe Wesley; Rodney L Holmes; Cynthia Gadd; Kevin B Johnson; Vicki Y Estrin Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2008-11-06
Authors: Carl van Walraven; Monica Taljaard; Chaim M Bell; Edward Etchells; Kelly B Zarnke; Ian G Stiell; Alan J Forster Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-11-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: James E Bailey; Jim Y Wan; Lisa M Mabry; Stephen H Landy; Rebecca A Pope; Teresa M Waters; Mark E Frisse Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Niam Yaraghi; Anna Ye Du; Raj Sharman; Ram D Gopal; R Ramesh; Ranjit Singh; Gurdev Singh Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-11-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Todd W Lyons; Karen L Olson; Nathan P Palmer; Reed Horwitz; Kenneth D Mandl; Andrew M Fine Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 3.451