Literature DB >> 17670775

The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened?

Robert H Miller1, Bradley S Miller.   

Abstract

The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange was once one of the most ambitious and publicized U.S. health information exchange (HIE) efforts. Eight years after its inception, and several months after providing some data, the Santa Barbara Project shut down operations. Despite its developed HIE infrastructure, participants found no compelling value proposition in initial HIE services. Even with fewer technology delays and more community leadership, other regional health information organizations (RHIOs) may also stumble over HIE service-value propositions without some combination of grants, incentives, and mandates that develop initial RHIO infrastructure and services and ensure provision of unprofitable yet socially valuable services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17670775     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  28 in total

1.  A Framework for evaluating the costs, effort, and value of nationwide health information exchange.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Atif Zafar; J Marc Overhage
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Health services research and data linkages: issues, methods, and directions for the future.

Authors:  Cathy J Bradley; Lynne Penberthy; Kelly J Devers; Debra J Holden
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange.

Authors:  Ana Lucia Hincapie; Terri L Warholak; Anita C Murcko; Marion Slack; Daniel C Malone
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Assessment of the usability and impact of the Idaho Health Data Exchange (IHDE).

Authors:  Janet Reis; Lisa MacKenzie; Terri Soelberg; Jennifer Smith
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts.

Authors:  Robert S Rudin; Steven R Simon; Lynn A Volk; Micky Tripathi; David Bates
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Characteristics associated with regional health information organization viability.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; John Landefeld; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Lessons from implementing a combined workflow-informatics system for diabetes management.

Authors:  Adrian H Zai; Richard W Grant; Greg Estey; William T Lester; Carl T Andrews; Ronnie Yee; Elizabeth Mort; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  User perspectives on the usability of a regional health information exchange.

Authors:  Cynthia S Gadd; Yun-Xian Ho; Cather Marie Cala; Dana Blakemore; Qingxia Chen; Mark E Frisse; Kevin B Johnson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Using health information exchange to improve public health.

Authors:  Jason S Shapiro; Farzad Mostashari; George Hripcsak; Nicholas Soulakis; Gilad Kuperman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Evaluating health information technology in community-based settings: lessons learned.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Jessica S Ancker; Erika Abramson; Vaishali Patel; Rina V Dhopeshwarkar; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.