Literature DB >> 21846730

3D ultrasound to assess the position of tubal sterilization microinserts.

Guillaume Legendre1, Jean-Marc Levaillant, Erika Faivre, Xavier Deffieux, Amélie Gervaise, Hervé Fernandez.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) for determining the position of Essure microinserts and the success of sterilization by the Essure method.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study examined the case records of 311 women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization from October 2002 through October 2008. Imaging with 3D-US or pelvic X-radiography or both was performed 3 months after the procedure to verify device position. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) was performed when a bilateral procedure was not completed because of a history of salpingectomy or blocked tube, when doubt persisted after 3D-US or pelvic radiography, or for comparative purposes in a prospective study. The positions seen on 3D-US were classified in four categories according to a specific scale we devised.
RESULTS: The insertion procedure was completed in 94.2% patients. Only 90.5% underwent imaging verification of the device 3 months afterwards. In all, 227 3D-US, 175 pelvic radiography and 64 HSG imaging procedures were performed. Visualization of the device was possible in 99.6% of the 3D-US images. According to our classification, 3D-US was appropriate for assessing device position for 195 (85.9%) patients. The need for HSG confirmation was significantly lower with 3D-US than radiographic imaging (14.1 versus 26.8%, P = 0.001). 3D-US examinations, compared with the results of HSG as the reference test, had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 76.6%. Neither pregnancy nor early expulsion occurred when 3D-US found that the devices were correctly placed.
CONCLUSIONS: 3D-US is a simple technique for assessing the position of Essure(®) microinserts, even after concomitant endometrial surgery. The 3D-US classification presented here appears to make it possible to use HSG for back-up confirmation only when the microinsert is found in a very distal position on 3D-US and thus to protect the majority of women from the negative effects of pelvic radiography and HSG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21846730     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  3 in total

Review 1.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 2.  Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  K McMartin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-10-01

3.  Essure Microinsert Abdominal Migration after Hysteroscopic Tubal Sterilization of an Appropriately Placed Essure Device: Dual Case Reports and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Shadi Rezai; Meghan LaBine; Hunter Azdel Gomez Roberts; Isamarie Lora Alcantara; Cassandra E Henderson; Malvina Elmadjian; Dilfuza Nuritdinova
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.