Literature DB >> 21844490

Treatment intensification in a hypertension telemanagement trial: clinical inertia or good clinical judgment?

Matthew J Crowley1, Valerie A Smith, Maren K Olsen, Susanne Danus, Eugene Z Oddone, Hayden B Bosworth, Benjamin J Powers.   

Abstract

Clinical inertia represents a barrier to hypertension management. As part of a hypertension telemanagement trial designed to overcome clinical inertia, we evaluated study physician reactions to elevated home blood pressures. We studied 296 patients from the Hypertension Intervention Nurse Telemedicine Study who received telemonitoring and study physician medication management. When a patient's 2-week mean home blood pressure was elevated, an "intervention alert" prompted study physicians to consider treatment intensification. We examined treatment intensification rates and subsequent blood pressure control. Patients generated 1216 intervention alerts during the 18-month intervention. Of 922 eligible intervention alerts, study physicians intensified treatment in 374 (40.6%). Study physician perception that home blood pressure was acceptable was the most common rationale for nonintensification (53.7%). When "blood pressure acceptable" was the reason for not intensifying treatment, the mean blood pressure was lower than for intervention alerts where treatment intensification occurred (135.3/76.7 versus 143.2/80.6 mm Hg; P<0.0001). Blood pressure acceptable intervention alerts were associated with the lowest incidence of repeat alerts (hazard ratio: 0.69 [95% CI: 0.58 to 0.83]), meaning that the patient home blood pressure was less likely to subsequently rise above goal, despite apparent clinical inertia. This telemedicine intervention targeting clinical inertia did not guarantee treatment intensification in response to elevated home blood pressures. However, when physicians did not intensify treatment, it was because blood pressure was closer to an acceptable threshold, and repeat blood pressure elevations occurred less frequently. Failure to intensify treatment when home blood pressure is elevated may, at times, represent good clinical judgment, not clinical inertia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21844490     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.174367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  18 in total

1.  Performance and persistence of a blood pressure self-management intervention: telemonitoring and self-management in hypertension (TASMINH2) trial.

Authors:  E P Bray; M I Jones; M Banting; S Greenfield; F D R Hobbs; P Little; B Williams; R J Mcmanus
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.012

2.  Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cases of Clinical Uncertainty to Differentiate Appropriate Inaction From Therapeutic Inertia.

Authors:  Sonal J Patil; Nuha K Wareg; Kelvin L Hodges; Jamie B Smith; Mark S Kaiser; Michael L LeFevre
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Guidelines, inertia, and judgment.

Authors:  Lawrence R Krakoff; Ian M Kronish
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 10.190

4.  Patient judgments about hypertension control: the role of patient numeracy and graph literacy.

Authors:  Victoria A Shaffer; Pete Wegier; K D Valentine; Sean Duan; Shannon M Canfield; Jeffery L Belden; Linsey M Steege; Mihail Popescu; Richelle J Koopman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 7.942

5.  Racial differences in the effect of a telephone-delivered hypertension disease management program.

Authors:  George L Jackson; Eugene Z Oddone; Maren K Olsen; Benjamin J Powers; Janet M Grubber; Felicia McCant; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Utilising digital health to improve medication-related quality of care for hypertensive patients: An integrative literature review.

Authors:  Kannikar Wechkunanukul; Daya Ram Parajuli; Mohammad Hamiduzzaman
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 1.337

7.  Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Valerija Bralić Lang; Biserka Bergman Marković; Ksenija Kranjčević
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 8.  The concept and definition of therapeutic inertia in hypertension in primary care: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Lebeau; Jean-Sébastien Cadwallader; Isabelle Aubin-Auger; Alain Mercier; Thomas Pasquet; Emmanuel Rusch; Kristin Hendrickx; Etienne Vermeire
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 9.  Telemonitoring: use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Darshi Sivakumaran; Kenneth Anthony Earle
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2014-04-10

10.  Physician and patient characteristics associated with clinical inertia in blood pressure control.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Jeffrey S Harman; Shuo Yang
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.