Literature DB >> 35927964

Patient judgments about hypertension control: the role of patient numeracy and graph literacy.

Victoria A Shaffer1, Pete Wegier2, K D Valentine3, Sean Duan1, Shannon M Canfield4, Jeffery L Belden4, Linsey M Steege5, Mihail Popescu6, Richelle J Koopman4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of patient health literacy, numeracy, and graph literacy on perceptions of hypertension control using different forms of data visualization.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants (Internet sample of 1079 patients with hypertension) reviewed 12 brief vignettes describing a fictitious patient; each vignette included a graph of the patient's blood pressure (BP) data. We examined how variations in mean systolic blood pressure, BP standard deviation, and form of visualization (eg, data table, graph with raw values or smoothed values only) affected judgments about hypertension control and need for medication change. We also measured patient's health literacy, subjective and objective numeracy, and graph literacy.
RESULTS: Judgments about hypertension data presented as a smoothed graph were significantly more positive (ie, hypertension deemed to be better controlled) then judgments about the same data presented as either a data table or an unsmoothed graph. Hypertension data viewed in tabular form was perceived more positively than graphs of the raw data. Data visualization had the greatest impact on participants with high graph literacy. DISCUSSION: Data visualization can direct patients to attend to more clinically meaningful information, thereby improving their judgments of hypertension control. However, patients with lower graph literacy may still have difficulty accessing important information from data visualizations.
CONCLUSION: Addressing uncertainty inherent in the variability between BP measurements is an important consideration in visualization design. Well-designed data visualization could help to alleviate clinical uncertainty, one of the key drivers of clinical inertia and uncontrolled hypertension.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data visualization; hypertension; primary care; risk perception

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35927964      PMCID: PMC9552283          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   7.942


  34 in total

Review 1.  Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zoe Hildon; Dominique Allwood; Nick Black
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  Agreement between ambulatory, home, and office blood pressure variability.

Authors:  Eeva P Juhanoja; Teemu J Niiranen; Jouni K Johansson; Pauli J Puukka; Antti M Jula
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.844

3.  Continuity of care and recognition of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Richelle J Koopman; Arch G Mainous; Richard Baker; James M Gill; Gregory E Gilbert
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-06-09

4.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

5.  Graph literacy: a cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Paul K Whelton; Robert M Carey; Wilbert S Aronow; Donald E Casey; Karen J Collins; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb; Sondra M DePalma; Samuel Gidding; Kenneth A Jamerson; Daniel W Jones; Eric J MacLaughlin; Paul Muntner; Bruce Ovbiagele; Sidney C Smith; Crystal C Spencer; Randall S Stafford; Sandra J Taler; Randal J Thomas; Kim A Williams; Jeff D Williamson; Jackson T Wright
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Undiagnosed obesity: implications for undiagnosed hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  Vanessa A Diaz; Arch G Mainous; Richelle J Koopman; Mark E Geesey
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Use of Enhanced Data Visualization to Improve Patient Judgments about Hypertension Control.

Authors:  Victoria A Shaffer; Pete Wegier; K D Valentine; Jeffery L Belden; Shannon M Canfield; Mihail Popescu; Linsey M Steege; Akshay Jain; Richelle J Koopman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Hypertension Prevalence and Control Among Adults: United States, 2011-2014.

Authors:  Sung Sug Sarah Yoon; Margaret D Carroll; Cheryl D Fryar
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2015-11

10.  The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Peter Ubel; Aleksandra Jancovic; Todd Lucas; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-08-27
View more
  1 in total

1.  Meeting the information and communication needs of health disparate populations.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 7.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.