Literature DB >> 21843942

Outcome of long term active surveillance for estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Anna F Meyerson1, Juan N Lessing, Kaoru Itakura, Nola M Hylton, Dulcy E Wolverton, Bonnie N Joe, Laura J Esserman, E Shelley Hwang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An option for active surveillance is not currently offered to patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); however a small number of women decline standard surgical treatment for noninvasive cancer. The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes in a cohort of 14 well-informed women who elected non-surgical active surveillance with endocrine treatment alone for estrogen receptor-positive DCIS.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 14 women, 12 of whom were enrolled in an IRB-approved single-arm study of 3 months of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy prior to definitive surgical management. The patients in this report withdrew from the parent study opting instead for active surveillance with endocrine treatment and imaging.
RESULTS: 8 women had surgery at a median follow up of 28.3 months (range 10.1-70 months), 5 had stage I IDC at surgical excision, and 3 had DCIS alone. 6 women remain on surveillance without evidence of invasive disease for a median of 31.8 months (range 11.8-80.8 months).
CONCLUSION: Long-term active surveillance for DCIS is feasible in a well-informed patient population, but is associated with risk of invasive cancer at surgical excision.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21843942      PMCID: PMC4087114          DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  23 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma-in-situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Karen Kinkel; Laura J Esserman; Ying Lu; Noel Weidner; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Harold J Burstein; Kornelia Polyak; Julia S Wong; Susan C Lester; Carolyn M Kaelin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Dignam; J Bryant; A DeCillis; D L Wickerham; N Wolmark; J Costantino; C Redmond; E R Fisher; D M Bowman; L Deschênes; N V Dimitrov; R G Margolese; A Robidoux; H Shibata; J Terz; A H Paterson; M I Feldman; W Farrar; J Evans; H L Lickley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Long-term follow-up of in situ carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  V Eusebi; E Feudale; M P Foschini; A Micheli; A Conti; C Riva; S Di Palma; F Rilke
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.464

5.  Age-specific incidence rates of in situ breast carcinomas by histologic type, 1980 to 2001.

Authors:  Christopher I Li; Janet R Daling; Kathleen E Malone
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Combined modality treatment of locally advanced breast carcinoma in elderly patients or patients with severe comorbid conditions using tamoxifen as the primary therapy.

Authors:  P M Hoff; V Valero; A U Buzdar; S E Singletary; R L Theriault; D Booser; L Asmar; D Frye; M D McNeese; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B Fisher; J Dignam; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; E R Fisher; E Mamounas; R Smith; M Begovic; N V Dimitrov; R G Margolese; C G Kardinal; M T Kavanah; L Fehrenbacher; R H Oishi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  MRI for the size assessment of pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): a prospective study of 33 patients.

Authors:  C Marcotte-Bloch; C Balu-Maestro; E Chamorey; F Ettore; I Raoust; B Flipo; C Chapellier
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: trial design and preliminary results.

Authors:  E Shelley Hwang; Laura Esserman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study.

Authors:  B Fisher; J P Costantino; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; M Kavanah; W M Cronin; V Vogel; A Robidoux; N Dimitrov; J Atkins; M Daly; S Wieand; E Tan-Chiu; L Ford; N Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-09-16       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  9 in total

1.  Regression of ductal carcinoma in situ after treatment with acupuncture.

Authors:  Regina Dehen
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Cancer Outcomes in DCIS Patients Without Locoregional Treatment.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Donald L Weaver; Fengmin Zhao; Mathias Worni; Lars J Grimm; Roman Gulati; Ruth Etzioni; Terry Hyslop; Sandra J Lee; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Women with Low-Risk DCIS Eligible for the LORIS Trial After Complete Surgical Excision: How Low Is Their Risk After Standard Therapy?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Sujata Patil; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Surgical Upstaging Rates for Vacuum Assisted Biopsy Proven DCIS: Implications for Active Surveillance Trials.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Marc D Ryser; Ann H Partridge; Alastair M Thompson; Jeremy S Thomas; Jelle Wesseling; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Lars J Grimm; Habib Rahbar; Monica Abdelmalak; Allison H Hall; Marc D Ryser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  An active surveillance program in oral preneoplasia and translational oncology benefit.

Authors:  Hunter Archibald; Seth Buryska; Frank G Ondrey
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-07-21

Review 7.  Low-risk DCIS. What is it? Observe or excise?

Authors:  Sarah E Pinder; Alastair M Thompson; Jelle Wesserling
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 4.535

Review 8.  Is the false-positive rate in mammography in North America too high?

Authors:  Michelle T Le; Carmel E Mothersill; Colin B Seymour; Fiona E McNeill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Importance of cost-effectiveness and value in cancer care and healthcare policy.

Authors:  Ravinder Kang; Philip P Goodney; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.454

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.