Literature DB >> 15824180

Age-specific incidence rates of in situ breast carcinomas by histologic type, 1980 to 2001.

Christopher I Li1, Janet R Daling, Kathleen E Malone.   

Abstract

Incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have increased rapidly over the past several decades largely due to the increased use of mammography. However, recent data from 1987 to 1999 indicate that invasive ductal carcinoma incidence rates have remained essentially constant, whereas rates of invasive lobular carcinoma have increased 65%, with greater increases observed among postmenopausal women. Data on recent trends in DCIS and LCIS incidence rates, particularly age-specific trends, are lacking. We evaluated trends in the incidence rates of DCIS overall, noncomedo DCIS, comedo DCIS, and LCIS using data from nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. DCIS incidence rates increased 7.2-fold [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6.8-7.7] from 1980 to 2001, 1.8-fold (95% CI, 1.7-1.9) over the past 10 years (1992-2001), and 1.1-fold (95% CI, 1.0-1.2) over the past 5 years (1997-2001). The magnitudes of these increases were highest among women ages > or = 50 years. Furthermore, over the past 10- and 5-year periods, rates of noncomedo DCIS have generally increased across all age groups, whereas rates of comedo DCIS held constant or decreased. LCIS incidence rates increased 2.6-fold (95% CI, 2.3-2.9) from 1980 to 2001, 1.3-fold (95% CI, 1.2-1.5) over the past 10 years, and 1.1-fold (95% CI, 1.0-1.3) over the past 5 years. Similar to invasive lobular carcinoma, but unlike invasive ductal carcinoma, incidence rates of both DCIS and LCIS continue to increase in the United States primarily among older women. These trends present important public health and clinical challenges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15824180     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  47 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of postradiotherapy bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Gary R Epler; Eileen M Kelly
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-10-31

2.  Progression of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from the Pathological Perspective.

Authors:  Pedro Oscar R Cunha; Mark Ornstein; J Louise Jones
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Predictive factors for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Soley Bayraktar; Nisreen Elsayegh; Angelica M Gutierrez Barrera; Heather Lin; Henry Kuerer; Tunc Tasbas; Kimberly I Muse; Kaylene Ready; Jennifer Litton; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Constance T Albarracin; Banu Arun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma in different races.

Authors:  Li-Yuan Yang; Li-Peng Yang; Biao Zhu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-19

5.  A case of lobular carcinoma in situ presenting as a solid mass.

Authors:  X Zhang; N Hanamura; M Yamasita; Y Kashikura; T Ogawa; S Taizo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Temporal trends in area socioeconomic disparities in breast-cancer incidence and mortality, 1988-2005.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Min Lian; Anjali D Deshpande; Elizabeth A Baker; Sandi L Pruitt; Rebecca Aft; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Low CD10 mRNA expression identifies high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Jérôme Toussaint; Virginie Durbecq; Sevilay Altintas; Valérie Doriath; Ghizlane Rouas; Marianne Paesmans; Philippe Bedard; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Wiebren A Tjalma; Denis Larsimont; Martine Piccart; Christos Sotiriou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Declining recurrence among ductal carcinoma in situ patients treated with breast-conserving surgery in the community setting.

Authors:  Laurel A Habel; Ninah S Achacoso; Reina Haque; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Suzanne W Fletcher; Stuart J Schnitt; Laura C Collins; Ann M Geiger; Balaram Puligandla; Luana Acton; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Assessment of breast cancer opportunistic screening by clinical-pathological indicators: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Bordoni; N M Probst-Hensch; L Mazzucchelli; A Spitale
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  PI-3 kinase activity is necessary for ERK1/2-induced disruption of mammary epithelial architecture.

Authors:  Gray W Pearson; Tony Hunter
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.