OBJECTIVE: Many patients with bipolar disorder do not regain their premorbid level of occupational functioning even after mood episodes have resolved. The reasons for this are not well understood. We evaluated the relationship between neurocognition and occupational function in bipolar disorder patients, following symptomatic recovery. METHODS: A total of 79 previously employed adults with bipolar I disorder who achieved symptomatic recovery (i.e., at least six weeks clinically euthymic) following a manic episode underwent a neurocognitive evaluation and assessment of occupational functioning. Study participants were evaluated every three months thereafter for up to nine months. Factor analysis was applied to reduce the initial set of neurocognitive variables to five domains: episodic memory, working memory/attention, executive function, visual scanning, and speed of processing. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the joint predictive values of these domains for determining occupational recovery. RESULTS: At the time of symptomatic recovery, four of five neurocognitive factors were significant predictors of concomitant occupational recovery and the fifth, executive function, showed a trend in the same direction. For those not occupationally recovered at baseline, longitudinal analyses revealed that changes between baseline and the three-month follow-up timepoint in most cognitive domains were robust and highly significant predictors of occupational recovery at three months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that better neurocognitive function in multiple domains and improvement in these domains over time are strongly predictive of subsequent occupational recovery. Treatments that target cognitive deficit may therefore have potential for improving long-term vocational functioning in bipolar illness.
OBJECTIVE: Many patients with bipolar disorder do not regain their premorbid level of occupational functioning even after mood episodes have resolved. The reasons for this are not well understood. We evaluated the relationship between neurocognition and occupational function in bipolar disorderpatients, following symptomatic recovery. METHODS: A total of 79 previously employed adults with bipolar I disorder who achieved symptomatic recovery (i.e., at least six weeks clinically euthymic) following a manic episode underwent a neurocognitive evaluation and assessment of occupational functioning. Study participants were evaluated every three months thereafter for up to nine months. Factor analysis was applied to reduce the initial set of neurocognitive variables to five domains: episodic memory, working memory/attention, executive function, visual scanning, and speed of processing. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the joint predictive values of these domains for determining occupational recovery. RESULTS: At the time of symptomatic recovery, four of five neurocognitive factors were significant predictors of concomitant occupational recovery and the fifth, executive function, showed a trend in the same direction. For those not occupationally recovered at baseline, longitudinal analyses revealed that changes between baseline and the three-month follow-up timepoint in most cognitive domains were robust and highly significant predictors of occupational recovery at three months. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that better neurocognitive function in multiple domains and improvement in these domains over time are strongly predictive of subsequent occupational recovery. Treatments that target cognitive deficit may therefore have potential for improving long-term vocational functioning in bipolar illness.
Authors: M Tohen; S M Strakowski; C Zarate; J Hennen; A L Stoll; T Suppes; G L Faedda; B M Cohen; P Gebre-Medhin; R J Baldessarini Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2000-09-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos; Vicente Balanzá-Martínez; José Sánchez-Moreno; Anabel Martinez-Aran; José Salazar-Fraile; Gabriel Selva-Vera; Cristina Rubio; Ignacio Mata; Manuel Gómez-Beneyto; Eduard Vieta Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Anabel Martínez-Arán; Eduard Vieta; María Reinares; Francesc Colom; Carla Torrent; Jose Sánchez-Moreno; Antonio Benabarre; José Manuel Goikolea; Mercè Comes; Manel Salamero Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Amy T Peters; Andrew D Peckham; Jonathan P Stange; Louisa G Sylvia; Natasha S Hansen; Stephanie Salcedo; Scott L Rauch; Andrew A Nierenberg; Darin D Dougherty; Thilo Deckersbach Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Benjamin S McKenna; Rebecca J Theilmann; Ashley N Sutherland; Lisa T Eyler Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Junghee Lee; Lori Altshuler; David C Glahn; David J Miklowitz; Kevin Ochsner; Michael F Green Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: A G Gildengers; D Chisholm; M A Butters; S J Anderson; A Begley; M Holm; J C Rogers; C F Reynolds; B H Mulsant Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: J Volkert; M A Schiele; Julia Kazmaier; Friederike Glaser; K C Zierhut; J Kopf; S Kittel-Schneider; A Reif Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2015-11-26 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: C M Bonnín; C Torrent; J M Goikolea; M Reinares; B Solé; M Valentí; J Sánchez-Moreno; D Hidalgo; R Tabarés-Seisdedos; A Martínez-Arán; E Vieta Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 5.270