Literature DB >> 21841194

Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population.

Aapo L Aro1, Olli Anttonen, Jani T Tikkanen, M Juhani Junttila, Tuomas Kerola, Harri A Rissanen, Antti Reunanen, Heikki V Huikuri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prolonged duration of QRS complex in a 12-lead ECG is associated with adverse prognosis in patients with cardiac disease, but its significance is not well established in the general population. In particular, there is a paucity of data on the prognostic significance of nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay in apparently healthy subjects. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated the 12-lead ECGs of 10 899 Finnish middle-aged subjects from the general population (52% of whom were men; mean age 44±8.5 years) between 1966 and 1972 and followed them for 30±11 years. Primary end points were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and arrhythmic death. Prolonged QRS duration was defined as QRS ≥110 ms and intraventricular conduction delay as QRS ≥110 ms, without the criteria of complete or incomplete bundle-branch block. QRS duration ≥110 ms was present in 1.3% (n=147) and intraventricular conduction delay in 0.6% (n=67) of the subjects. Prolonged QRS duration predicted all-cause mortality (multivariate-adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.81; P<0.001), cardiac mortality (RR 1.94; CI 1.44-2.63; P<0.001), and sudden arrhythmic death (RR 2.14; CI 1.38-3.33; P=0.002). Subjects with intraventricular conduction delay had increased all-cause mortality (RR 2.01; CI 1.52-2.66; P<0.001), increased cardiac mortality (RR 2.53; CI 1.64-3.90; P<0.001), and an elevated risk of arrhythmic death (RR 3.11; CI 1.74-5.54; P=0.001). Left bundle-branch block also weakly predicted arrhythmic death (P=0.04), but right bundle-branch block was not associated with increased mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged QRS duration in a standard 12-lead ECG is associated with increased mortality in a general population, with intraventricular conduction delay being most strongly associated with an increased risk of arrhythmic death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21841194     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.963561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1941-3084


  46 in total

Review 1.  The 12-lead electrocardiogram and risk of sudden death: current utility and future prospects.

Authors:  Kumar Narayanan; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Normal standards for computer-ECG programs for prognostically and diagnostically important ECG variables derived from a large ethnically diverse female cohort: the Women's Health Initiative (WHI).

Authors:  Pentti M Rautaharju; Zhu-ming Zhang; Richard E Gregg; Wesley K Haisty; Mara Z Vitolins; Anne B Curtis; James Warren; Milan B Horaĉek; Sophia H Zhou; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.438

3.  The Romhilt-Estes electrocardiographic score predicts sudden cardiac arrest independent of left ventricular mass and ejection fraction.

Authors:  Navid Darouian; Aapo L Aro; Kumar Narayanan; Audrey Uy-Evanado; Carmen Rusinaru; Kyndaron Reinier; Karen Gunson; Jonathan Jui; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  Sudden cardiac death risk stratification.

Authors:  Marc W Deyell; Andrew D Krahn; Jeffrey J Goldberger
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  The year of 2011 in electrocardiology.

Authors:  Shlomo Stern
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Ventricular conduction defects and the risk of incident heart failure in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Zhu-Ming Zhang; Pentti M Rautaharju; Ronald J Prineas; Laura Loehr; Wayne Rosamond; Elsayed Z Soliman
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 7.  New approaches to predicting the risk of sudden death.

Authors:  Elijah Behr; Bode Ensam
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 8.  Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification - An Update.

Authors:  Reginald Liew
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2015-12

Review 9.  Abnormal ECG Findings in Athletes: Clinical Evaluation and Considerations.

Authors:  Mark Abela; Sanjay Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-12-21

10.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement with Perceval bioprosthesis: are there predicting factors for postoperative pacemaker implantation?

Authors:  Ferdinand Vogt; Steffen Pfeiffer; Angelo Maria Dell'Aquila; Theodor Fischlein; Giuseppe Santarpino
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.