Literature DB >> 21840682

Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps.

Yohko Murakami1, Edward E Manche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare intraoperative subtraction pachymetry flap thickness measurements and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) flap thickness measurements in eyes that had laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap creation with a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome.
SETTING: Stanford Eye Laser Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Each patient received wavefront-guided LASIK using an Intralase femtosecond laser in 1 eye and a Hansatome mechanical microkeratome in the fellow eye. Flap morphology was assessed with an ultrasound pachymeter intraoperatively and an AS-OCT system postoperatively at 1 year.
RESULTS: Thirty-six eyes (18 patients) were enrolled. Intraoperative subtraction pachymetry consistently underestimated mechanical microkeratome flap thickness compared with postoperative AS-OCT (P<.001). There was no significant difference between intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative AS-OCT measurements for femtosecond flaps (P=.38). The overall mean variation in flap thickness (ie, mean deviation from targeted flap thickness) was 2.6 μm (range 3 to 11 μm) with the femtosecond laser and 14.2 μm (range 17 to 52 μm) with the mechanical microkeratome (P<.001). Postoperative AS-OCT measurements showed femtosecond flaps had a planar configuration and mechanical microkeratome flaps had a meniscus-shaped configuration.
CONCLUSIONS: The femtosecond laser created more uniformly planar flaps than the mechanical microkeratome as measured by intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative AS-OCT. Postoperative AS-OCT measurements varied less than intraoperative subtraction pachymetry measurements for mechanical microkeratome flaps. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2011 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840682     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Comparisons of morphologic characteristics between thin-flap LASIK and SBK.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Ying-Ping Deng; Lin Wang; Yong-Zhi Huang; Le-Mei Qiu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Zhang; Xing-Wu Zhong; Jun-Shu Wu; Zheng Wang; Ke-Ming Yu; Quan Liu; Bin Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK.

Authors:  Christopher T Hood; Ronald R Krueger; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Role of optical coherence tomography on corneal surface laser ablation.

Authors:  Bruna V Ventura; Haroldo V Moraes; Newton Kara-Junior; Marcony R Santhiago
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Three-dimensional LASIK flap thickness variability: topographic central, paracentral and peripheral assessment, in flaps created by a mechanical microkeratome (M2) and two different femtosecond lasers (FS60 and FS200).

Authors:  A John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-03

6.  The morphology of corneal cap and its relation to refractive outcomes in femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography observation.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Peijun Yao; Meiyan Li; Zhi Chen; Yang Shen; Zhennan Zhao; Zimei Zhou; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.