Literature DB >> 21840574

Thromboprophylaxis following cesarean delivery: one site prospective pilot study to evaluate the application of a risk score model.

Stefania Cavazza1, Maria Pia Rainaldi, Angelina Adduci, Gualtiero Palareti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains an important cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Cesarean delivery (CD) is a known risk factor for VTE. Data from clinical trials of thomboprophylaxis following CD are lacking and current guidelines are based on experts opinion. Our aim was to assess the efficacy of a risk score model, established at our institution, in preventing CD-related VTE.
METHODS: Before undergoing CD women received a risk score assessment based on age, weight, history of thrombosis, thrombophilia, immobility, parity and varicose vein. Women at moderate-high risk received pharmacological prophylaxis; all patients wore antithrombotic stockings. They had a visit before discharge and were advised to come back for visit and ultrasound if required. All received a follow-up phone call after three months.
RESULTS: 501 consecutive women were included in the study; 233 (46.5%), at low risk, had no pharmacological prophylaxis; one of them developed a symptomatic leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT); 268 (53.5%), at moderate-high risk, received enoxaparin and none of them developed VTE. Two were lost at follow up. The incidence of DVT was 1/499 (0.2%; 95%CI 0-1.1%). The differences in major and minor bleeding were not significant between women who received or not prophylaxis respectively (1/267 vs 1/232, p=1 and 3/267 vs 1/232, p=0.62).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk score model applied proved effective in avoiding pharmacological prophylaxis in almost half of women and safe, since the rate of failure resulted very low (0.2%, C.I.95 0-1.1%) and there were not significant differences in bleeding in the two groups.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21840574     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  5 in total

Review 1.  Risk stratification for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: Potential role for global coagulation assays.

Authors:  David O'Keefe; Hui Yin Lim; Lisa Hui; Prahlad Ho
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-08-05

2.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Anita Rajasekhar; Saskia Middeldorp; Claire McLintock; Marc A Rodger; Andra H James; Sara R Vazquez; Ian A Greer; John J Riva; Meha Bhatt; Nicole Schwab; Danielle Barrett; Andrea LaHaye; Bram Rochwerg
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 3.  Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy.

Authors:  E Conti; L Zezza; E Ralli; C Comito; L Sada; J Passerini; D Caserta; S Rubattu; C Autore; M Moscarini; M Volpe
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Efficacy and safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with fondaparinux in women at risk after cesarean section.

Authors:  Ryuji Kawaguchi; Shoji Haruta; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2017-10-17

5.  Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and in the puerperium: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abdullah Pandor; Jahnavi Daru; Beverley J Hunt; Gill Rooney; Jean Hamilton; Mark Clowes; Steve Goodacre; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Sarah Davis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.