BACKGROUND: In the United States, mortality from cardiovascular disease has become increasingly common among HIV-infected persons. One-third of HIV-infected persons in care may rely on state-run AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) for cardiovascular disease-related prescription drugs. There is no federal mandate regarding ADAP coverage for non-HIV medications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistency of ADAP coverage for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking cessation using clinical guidelines as the standard of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 53 state and territorial ADAP formularies. MAIN MEASURES: ADAPs covering all first-line drugs for a cardiovascular risk factor were categorized as "consistent" with guidelines, while ADAPs covering at least one first-line drug, but not all, for a cardiovascular risk factor, were categorized as "partially consistent". ADAPs without coverage were categorized as "no coverage". KEY RESULTS: Of 53 ADAPs, four (7.5%) provided coverage consistent with guidelines (coverage for all first-line drugs) for all four cardiovascular risk factors. Thirteen (24.5%) provided no coverage for all four risk factors. Thirty-six (68%) provided at least partially consistent coverage for at least one surveyed risk factor. State ADAPs provided coverage consistent with guidelines most frequently for type 2 diabetes (28%), followed by hypertension (25%), hyperlipidemia (15%) and smoking cessation (8%). Statins (66%) were most commonly covered and nicotine replacement therapies (9%) least often. Many ADAPs provided no first-line treatment coverage for hypertension (60%), type 2 diabetes (51%), smoking cessation (45%), and hyperlipidemia (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Consistency of ADAP coverage with guidelines for the surveyed cardiovascular risk factors varies widely. Given the increasing lifespan of HIV-infected persons and restricted ADAP budgets, we recommend ADAP coverage be consistent with guidelines for cardiovascular risk factors.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, mortality from cardiovascular disease has become increasingly common among HIV-infectedpersons. One-third of HIV-infectedpersons in care may rely on state-run AIDS Drug Assistance Programs (ADAPs) for cardiovascular disease-related prescription drugs. There is no federal mandate regarding ADAP coverage for non-HIV medications. OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistency of ADAP coverage for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking cessation using clinical guidelines as the standard of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey of 53 state and territorial ADAP formularies. MAIN MEASURES: ADAPs covering all first-line drugs for a cardiovascular risk factor were categorized as "consistent" with guidelines, while ADAPs covering at least one first-line drug, but not all, for a cardiovascular risk factor, were categorized as "partially consistent". ADAPs without coverage were categorized as "no coverage". KEY RESULTS: Of 53 ADAPs, four (7.5%) provided coverage consistent with guidelines (coverage for all first-line drugs) for all four cardiovascular risk factors. Thirteen (24.5%) provided no coverage for all four risk factors. Thirty-six (68%) provided at least partially consistent coverage for at least one surveyed risk factor. State ADAPs provided coverage consistent with guidelines most frequently for type 2 diabetes (28%), followed by hypertension (25%), hyperlipidemia (15%) and smoking cessation (8%). Statins (66%) were most commonly covered and nicotine replacement therapies (9%) least often. Many ADAPs provided no first-line treatment coverage for hypertension (60%), type 2 diabetes (51%), smoking cessation (45%), and hyperlipidemia (32%). CONCLUSIONS: Consistency of ADAP coverage with guidelines for the surveyed cardiovascular risk factors varies widely. Given the increasing lifespan of HIV-infectedpersons and restricted ADAP budgets, we recommend ADAP coverage be consistent with guidelines for cardiovascular risk factors.
Authors: Nancy F Crum; Robert H Riffenburgh; Scott Wegner; Brian K Agan; Sybil A Tasker; Katherine M Spooner; Adam W Armstrong; Susan Fraser; Mark R Wallace Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Bernard M Branson; H Hunter Handsfield; Margaret A Lampe; Robert S Janssen; Allan W Taylor; Sheryl B Lyss; Jill E Clark Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2006-09-22
Authors: Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Nina Friis-Møller; Peter Reiss; Caroline A Sabin; Rainer Weber; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Wafaa El-Sadr; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Stephane De Wit; Ole Kirk; Eric Fontas; Matthew G Law; Andrew Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Andrew Carr; Cassy Workman; Dianne Carey; Gary Rogers; Allison Martin; David Baker; Handan Wand; Matthew Law; Katherine Samaras; Sean Emery; David A Cooper Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-02-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nina Friis-Møller; Caroline A Sabin; Rainer Weber; Antonella d'Arminio Monforte; Wafaa M El-Sadr; Peter Reiss; Rodolphe Thiébaut; Linda Morfeldt; Stephane De Wit; Christian Pradier; Gonzalo Calvo; Matthew G Law; Ole Kirk; Andrew N Phillips; Jens D Lundgren Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-11-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Emma Sophia Kay; Andrew Edmonds; Christina Ludema; Adaora Adimora; Maria L Alcaide; Aruna Chandran; Mardge H Cohen; Mallory O Johnson; Seble Kassaye; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Caitlin A Moran; Oluwakemi Sosanya; Tracey E Wilson Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2020-11-25
Authors: David B Hanna; Kate Buchacz; Kelly A Gebo; Nancy A Hessol; Michael A Horberg; Lisa P Jacobson; Gregory D Kirk; Mari M Kitahata; P Todd Korthuis; Richard D Moore; Sonia Napravnik; Pragna Patel; Michael J Silverberg; Timothy R Sterling; James H Willig; Ann Collier; Hasina Samji; Jennifer E Thorne; Keri N Althoff; Jeffrey N Martin; Benigno Rodriguez; Elizabeth A Stuart; Stephen J Gange Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 3.240