Literature DB >> 21837088

1,1'-(4,4'-Bipiperidine-1,1'-di-yl)bis-(2,2,2-trifluoro-ethanone).

Vitthal N Yadav1, Tore Hansen, Carl Henrik Görbitz.   

Abstract

The title compound, C(14)H(18)F(6)N(2)O(2), has a central center of symmetry with both piperidine rings occurring in regular chair conformations. Even though the structure is fairly compact with no sizable voids, the shortest H⋯O distance is as long as 2.58 Å.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21837088      PMCID: PMC3151791          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of and structures related to 4,4′-bipiperidine compounds, see: Medina et al. (1991 ▶); Li et al. (2009 ▶); Wang et al. (2007 ▶); Melchiorre et al. (2001 ▶); Adams et al. (2006 ▶); Angeloni & Orpen (2001 ▶); De las Casas Engel et al. (2010 ▶). For a related synthesis, see: Schenck et al. (2004 ▶). For inter­pretation of C—H⋯F bond configurations, see: Shimoni & Glusker (1994 ▶). For the use of a large specimen for data collection, see: Görbitz (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C14H18F6N2O2 M = 360.30 Triclinic, a = 6.6825 (12) Å b = 6.7350 (12) Å c = 9.3089 (16) Å α = 99.952 (2)° β = 108.564 (2)° γ = 101.542 (2)° V = 376.30 (12) Å3 Z = 1 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.16 mm−1 T = 105 K 1.00 × 0.50 × 0.25 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007 ▶) T min = 0.921, T max = 0.962 3303 measured reflections 1731 independent reflections 1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.009

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.029 wR(F 2) = 0.080 S = 1.06 1731 reflections 109 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.39 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.23 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2007 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2007 ▶); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022434/ng5179sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022434/ng5179Isup2.hkl Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811022434/ng5179Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C14H18F6N2O2Z = 1
Mr = 360.30F(000) = 186
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.590 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Melting point: 397 K
a = 6.6825 (12) ÅMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
b = 6.7350 (12) ÅCell parameters from 2545 reflections
c = 9.3089 (16) Åθ = 2.4–28.3°
α = 99.952 (2)°µ = 0.16 mm1
β = 108.564 (2)°T = 105 K
γ = 101.542 (2)°Rods, colourless
V = 376.30 (12) Å31.00 × 0.50 × 0.25 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer1731 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1586 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.009
Detector resolution: 8.3 pixels mm-1θmax = 28.6°, θmin = 2.4°
Sets of exposures each taken over 0.5° ω rotation scansh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.921, Tmax = 0.962l = −12→12
3303 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.029Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.080H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0398P)2 + 0.1258P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1731 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.008
109 parametersΔρmax = 0.39 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.23 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F10.11060 (12)0.31663 (10)0.84127 (9)0.03113 (19)
F20.00855 (11)0.51373 (11)0.68885 (8)0.02834 (18)
F30.13374 (10)0.63747 (10)0.93992 (7)0.02236 (16)
O10.49112 (14)0.43556 (12)0.82275 (10)0.02475 (19)
N10.47091 (14)0.76768 (13)0.81595 (10)0.01700 (19)
C20.68525 (17)0.82626 (17)0.80093 (12)0.0199 (2)
H210.76400.71930.82550.024*
H220.77450.96220.87640.024*
C30.65544 (17)0.84357 (16)0.63442 (12)0.0186 (2)
H310.57980.70360.56070.022*
H320.80140.89060.62740.022*
C40.52192 (16)0.99793 (15)0.58605 (11)0.0155 (2)
H410.60991.14130.65340.019*
C50.30751 (16)0.94359 (15)0.61687 (11)0.0166 (2)
H510.23211.05450.59870.020*
H520.20990.81010.54180.020*
C60.34705 (17)0.92258 (15)0.78370 (12)0.0171 (2)
H610.43041.06000.85920.021*
H620.20470.87790.79650.021*
C70.39316 (17)0.57031 (16)0.82058 (11)0.0176 (2)
C80.15978 (18)0.51030 (16)0.82412 (13)0.0210 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F10.0357 (4)0.0179 (3)0.0457 (4)0.0046 (3)0.0226 (3)0.0114 (3)
F20.0223 (3)0.0307 (4)0.0252 (3)0.0026 (3)0.0040 (3)0.0043 (3)
F30.0247 (3)0.0240 (3)0.0250 (3)0.0098 (3)0.0148 (3)0.0082 (3)
O10.0318 (4)0.0201 (4)0.0305 (4)0.0140 (3)0.0164 (4)0.0093 (3)
N10.0180 (4)0.0177 (4)0.0194 (4)0.0078 (3)0.0087 (3)0.0080 (3)
C20.0169 (5)0.0246 (5)0.0218 (5)0.0080 (4)0.0078 (4)0.0110 (4)
C30.0184 (5)0.0217 (5)0.0207 (5)0.0093 (4)0.0093 (4)0.0095 (4)
C40.0164 (4)0.0152 (4)0.0163 (5)0.0055 (4)0.0065 (4)0.0052 (4)
C50.0175 (5)0.0175 (4)0.0174 (5)0.0073 (4)0.0072 (4)0.0063 (4)
C60.0211 (5)0.0160 (4)0.0185 (5)0.0090 (4)0.0093 (4)0.0065 (4)
C70.0218 (5)0.0174 (5)0.0157 (4)0.0070 (4)0.0086 (4)0.0043 (4)
C80.0238 (5)0.0171 (5)0.0233 (5)0.0053 (4)0.0103 (4)0.0058 (4)
F1—C81.3299 (12)C3—H310.9900
F2—C81.3478 (13)C3—H320.9900
F3—C81.3363 (12)C4—C51.5354 (14)
O1—C71.2199 (13)C4—C4i1.5404 (19)
N1—C71.3403 (13)C4—H411.0000
N1—C21.4654 (13)C5—C61.5268 (13)
N1—C61.4694 (12)C5—H510.9900
C2—C31.5267 (14)C5—H520.9900
C2—H210.9900C6—H610.9900
C2—H220.9900C6—H620.9900
C3—C41.5352 (13)C7—C81.5433 (15)
C7—N1—C2118.28 (8)C6—C5—C4112.24 (8)
C7—N1—C6127.41 (9)C6—C5—H51109.2
C2—N1—C6112.38 (8)C4—C5—H51109.2
N1—C2—C3110.03 (8)C6—C5—H52109.2
N1—C2—H21109.7C4—C5—H52109.2
C3—C2—H21109.7H51—C5—H52107.9
N1—C2—H22109.7N1—C6—C5109.91 (8)
C3—C2—H22109.7N1—C6—H61109.7
H21—C2—H22108.2C5—C6—H61109.7
C2—C3—C4111.99 (8)N1—C6—H62109.7
C2—C3—H31109.2C5—C6—H62109.7
C4—C3—H31109.2H61—C6—H62108.2
C2—C3—H32109.2O1—C7—N1125.64 (10)
C4—C3—H32109.2O1—C7—C8117.66 (9)
H31—C3—H32107.9N1—C7—C8116.70 (9)
C5—C4—C3109.77 (8)F1—C8—F3107.55 (8)
C5—C4—C4i111.59 (10)F1—C8—F2107.07 (9)
C3—C4—C4i111.60 (10)F3—C8—F2107.07 (9)
C5—C4—H41107.9F1—C8—C7110.32 (9)
C3—C4—H41107.9F3—C8—C7113.47 (9)
C4i—C4—H41107.9F2—C8—C7111.08 (8)
C7—N1—C2—C3104.98 (10)C2—N1—C7—O14.65 (15)
C6—N1—C2—C3−60.38 (11)C6—N1—C7—O1167.54 (10)
N1—C2—C3—C455.87 (11)C2—N1—C7—C8−175.62 (8)
C2—C3—C4—C5−51.51 (11)C6—N1—C7—C8−12.72 (15)
C2—C3—C4—C4i−175.77 (10)O1—C7—C8—F14.75 (13)
C3—C4—C5—C651.41 (11)N1—C7—C8—F1−175.01 (8)
C4i—C4—C5—C6175.67 (9)O1—C7—C8—F3125.51 (10)
C7—N1—C6—C5−103.67 (11)N1—C7—C8—F3−54.25 (12)
C2—N1—C6—C560.06 (11)O1—C7—C8—F2−113.81 (10)
C4—C5—C6—N1−55.39 (11)N1—C7—C8—F266.43 (12)
  6 in total

1.  Design, synthesis, and biological activity of methoctramine-related polyamines as putative G(i) protein activators.

Authors:  C Melchiorre; M L Bolognesi; R Budriesi; C Ghelardini; A Chiarini; A Minarini; M Rosini; V Tumiatti; E J Wade
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Cation and anion diversity in [M(dithiooxalate)2]2- salts: structure robustness in crystal synthesis.

Authors:  Christopher J Adams; Paul C Crawford; A Guy Orpen; Thomas J Podesta
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 4.390

4.  What is the best crystal size for collection of X-ray data? Refinement of the structure of glycyl-L-serine based on data from a very large crystal.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B       Date:  1999-12-01

5.  HETEROCYCLIC AMIDE HYDRAPHILE SYNTHETIC CATION TRANSPORTERS.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Carl R Yamnitz; George W Gokel
Journal:  Heterocycles       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.831

6.  Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel hydroxyamides as orally available anticonvulsants.

Authors:  Hilary A Schenck; Paul W Lenkowski; Indrani Choudhury-Mukherjee; Seong-Hoon Ko; James P Stables; Manoj K Patel; Milton L Brown
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 3.641

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.