RATIONALE: Transplantation of human CD34(+) stem cells to ischemic tissues has been associated with reduced angina, improved exercise time, and reduced amputation rates in phase 2 clinical trials and has been shown to induce neovascularization in preclinical models. Previous studies have suggested that paracrine factors secreted by these proangiogenic cells are responsible, at least in part, for the angiogenic effects induced by CD34(+) cell transplantation. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the mechanism of CD34(+) stem cell-induced proangiogenic paracrine effects and to examine if exosomes, a component of paracrine secretion, are involved. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exosomes collected from the conditioned media of mobilized human CD34(+) cells had the characteristic size (40 to 90 nm; determined by dynamic light scattering), cup-shaped morphology (electron microscopy), expressed exosome-marker proteins CD63, phosphatidylserine (flow cytometry) and TSG101 (immunoblotting), besides expressing CD34(+) cell lineage marker protein, CD34. In vitro, CD34(+) exosomes replicated the angiogenic activity of CD34(+) cells by increasing endothelial cell viability, proliferation, and tube formation on Matrigel. In vivo, the CD34(+) exosomes stimulated angiogenesis in Matrigel plug and corneal assays. Interestingly, exosomes from CD34(+) cells but not from CD34(+) cell-depleted mononuclear cells had angiogenic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that human CD34(+) cells secrete exosomes that have independent angiogenic activity both in vitro and in vivo. CD34(+) exosomes may represent a significant component of the paracrine effect of progenitor cell transplantation for therapeutic angiogenesis.
RATIONALE: Transplantation of humanCD34(+) stem cells to ischemic tissues has been associated with reduced angina, improved exercise time, and reduced amputation rates in phase 2 clinical trials and has been shown to induce neovascularization in preclinical models. Previous studies have suggested that paracrine factors secreted by these proangiogenic cells are responsible, at least in part, for the angiogenic effects induced by CD34(+) cell transplantation. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate the mechanism of CD34(+) stem cell-induced proangiogenic paracrine effects and to examine if exosomes, a component of paracrine secretion, are involved. METHODS AND RESULTS: Exosomes collected from the conditioned media of mobilized humanCD34(+) cells had the characteristic size (40 to 90 nm; determined by dynamic light scattering), cup-shaped morphology (electron microscopy), expressed exosome-marker proteins CD63, phosphatidylserine (flow cytometry) and TSG101 (immunoblotting), besides expressing CD34(+) cell lineage marker protein, CD34. In vitro, CD34(+) exosomes replicated the angiogenic activity of CD34(+) cells by increasing endothelial cell viability, proliferation, and tube formation on Matrigel. In vivo, the CD34(+) exosomes stimulated angiogenesis in Matrigel plug and corneal assays. Interestingly, exosomes from CD34(+) cells but not from CD34(+) cell-depleted mononuclear cells had angiogenic activity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that humanCD34(+) cells secrete exosomes that have independent angiogenic activity both in vitro and in vivo. CD34(+) exosomes may represent a significant component of the paracrine effect of progenitor cell transplantation for therapeutic angiogenesis.
Authors: Douglas W Losordo; Timothy D Henry; Charles Davidson; Joon Sup Lee; Marco A Costa; Theodore Bass; Farrell Mendelsohn; F David Fortuin; Carl J Pepine; Jay H Traverse; David Amrani; Bruce M Ewenstein; Norbert Riedel; Kenneth Story; Kerry Barker; Thomas J Povsic; Robert A Harrington; Richard A Schatz Journal: Circ Res Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: T Asahara; T Murohara; A Sullivan; M Silver; R van der Zee; T Li; B Witzenbichler; G Schatteman; J M Isner Journal: Science Date: 1997-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Hadi Valadi; Karin Ekström; Apostolos Bossios; Margareta Sjöstrand; James J Lee; Jan O Lötvall Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Anna Grochot-Przeczek; Jerzy Kotlinowski; Magdalena Kozakowska; Katarzyna Starowicz; Jolanta Jagodzinska; Anna Stachurska; Oscar L Volger; Karolina Bukowska-Strakova; Urszula Florczyk; Magdalena Tertil; Agnieszka Jazwa; Krzysztof Szade; Jacek Stepniewski; Agnieszka Loboda; Anton J G Horrevoets; Jozef Dulak; Alicja Jozkowicz Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Joshua Mayourian; Delaine K Ceholski; David M Gonzalez; Timothy J Cashman; Susmita Sahoo; Roger J Hajjar; Kevin D Costa Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-01-05 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Arun K Sharma; Matthew I Bury; Natalie J Fuller; Andrew J Marks; David M Kollhoff; Manoj V Rao; Partha V Hota; Derek J Matoka; Seby L Edassery; Hatim Thaker; John F Sarwark; Joseph A Janicki; Guillermo A Ameer; Earl Y Cheng Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-02-19 Impact factor: 11.205