Literature DB >> 21835572

"Hook-like effect" causes false-negative point-of-care urine pregnancy testing in emergency patients.

Richard T Griffey1, Caleb J Trent, Rebecca A Bavolek, Jacob B Keeperman, Christopher Sampson, Robert F Poirier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure to detect pregnancy in the emergency department (ED) can have important consequences. Urine human chorionic gonadotropin (uhCG) point-of-care (POC) assays are valued for rapidly detecting early pregnancy with high sensitivity. However, under certain conditions, POC uhCG tests can fail to detect pregnancy.
OBJECTIVES: In investigating a series of late first-trimester false-negative pregnancy tests in our ED, a novel and distinct causative phenomenon was recently elucidated in our institution. We discuss uhCG POC tests, review our false-negative rate, and describe mechanisms for false negatives and potential remedies. DISCUSSION: The false-negative POC uhCG rate is very low, but in the setting of a large volume of tests, the numbers are worth consideration. In positive uhCG POC tests, free and fixed antibodies bind hCG to form a "sandwich"; hCG is present in several variant forms that change in their concentrations at different stages of pregnancy. When in excess, intact hCG can saturate the antibodies, preventing sandwich formation (hook effect phenomenon). Some assays may include an antibody that does not recognize certain variants present in later stages of pregnancy. When this variant is in excess, it can bind one antibody avidly and the other not at all, resulting in a false-negative test (hook-like phenomenon). In both situations, dilution is key to an accurate test.
CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturers should consider that uhCG tests are routinely used at many stages of pregnancy. Characterizing uhCG variants recognized by their tests and eliminating lot-to-lot variability may help improve uhCG test performance. Clinicians need to be aware of and familiarize themselves with the limitations of the specific type of uhCG POC tests used in their practice, recognizing that under certain circumstances, false-negative tests can occur.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835572     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  6 in total

1.  Pregnancy presenting as hyperthyroidism with negative urine pregnancy test.

Authors:  Rita Jindal; Desh Deepak; Gopal Chandra Ghosh; Mamta Gupta
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-20

Review 2.  Current and emerging trends in point-of-care urinalysis tests.

Authors:  Rongwei Lei; Rannon Huo; Chandra Mohan
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  The "hook effect" causing a negative pregnancy test in a patient with an advanced molar pregnancy.

Authors:  Abigail D Winder; Adria Suarez Mora; Emily Berry; John R Lurain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-06-07

4.  A 34-Week Size Uterus with a Complete Hydatidiform Mole: Hook Effect and Severe Anemia with No Vaginal Bleeding.

Authors:  Rodney McLaren; Vijaya Bayya; Mohamad Irani
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-13

5.  False negative point-of-care urine pregnancy tests in an urban academic emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sarah Kleinschmidt; Julianne N Dugas; Kerrie P Nelson; James A Feldman
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2021-05-01

6.  False Negative Urine Pregnancy Test: Hook Effect Revealed.

Authors:  Shista Priyadarshini; Fnu Manas; Sheela Prabhu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.