Literature DB >> 21835378

Stress CMR imaging observation unit in the emergency department reduces 1-year medical care costs in patients with acute chest pain: a randomized study for comparison with inpatient care.

Chadwick D Miller1, Wenke Hwang, Doug Case, James W Hoekstra, Cedric Lefebvre, Howard Blumstein, Craig A Hamilton, Erin N Harper, W Gregory Hundley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the direct cost of medical care and clinical events during the first year after patients with intermediate risk acute chest pain were randomized to stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) observation unit (OU) testing versus inpatient care.
BACKGROUND: In a recent study, randomization to OU-CMR reduced median index hospitalization cost compared with the cost of inpatient care in patients presenting to the emergency department with intermediate risk acute chest pain.
METHODS: Emergency department patients with intermediate risk chest pain were randomized to OU-CMR (OU care, cardiac markers, stress CMR) or inpatient care (admission, care per admitting provider). This analysis reports the direct cost of cardiac-related care and clinical outcomes (myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiovascular death) during the first year of follow-up subsequent to discharge. Consistent with health economics literature, provider cost was calculated from work-related relative value units using the Medicare conversion factor; facility charges were converted to cost using departmental-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Linear models were used to compare cost accumulation among study groups.
RESULTS: We included 109 randomized subjects in this analysis (52 OU-CMR, 57 inpatient care). The median age was 56 years; baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. At 1 year, 6% of OU-CMR and 9% of inpatient care participants experienced a major cardiac event (p = 0.72) with 1 patient in each group experiencing a cardiac event after discharge. First-year cardiac-related costs were significantly lower for participants randomized to OU-CMR than for participants receiving inpatient care (geometric mean = $3,101 vs. $4,742 including the index visit [p = 0.004] and $29 vs. $152 following discharge [p = 0.012]). During the year following randomization, 6% of OU-CMR and 9% of inpatient care participants experienced a major cardiac event (p = 0.72).
CONCLUSIONS: An OU-CMR strategy reduces cardiac-related costs of medical care during the index visit and over the first year subsequent to discharge, without an observed increase in major cardiac events. (Cost Comparison of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI] Use in Emergency Department [ED] Patients With Chest Pain; NCT00678639).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21835378      PMCID: PMC3645003          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  10 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Anderson; Cynthia D Adams; Elliott M Antman; Charles R Bridges; Robert M Califf; Donald E Casey; William E Chavey; Francis M Fesmire; Judith S Hochman; Thomas N Levin; A Michael Lincoff; Eric D Peterson; Pierre Theroux; Nanette Kass Wenger; R Scott Wright; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon A Hunt; Harlan M Krumholz; Frederick G Kushner; Bruce W Lytle; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Electronic medical record review as a surrogate to telephone follow-up to establish outcome for diagnostic research studies in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Alice M Mitchell; Michael S Runyon; Alan E Jones; William B Webb
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 3.  ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training.

Authors:  Matthew J Budoff; Mylan C Cohen; Mario J Garcia; John McB Hodgson; W Gregory Hundley; Joao A C Lima; Warren J Manning; Gerald M Pohost; Paolo M Raggi; George P Rodgers; John A Rumberger; Allen J Taylor; Mark A Creager; John W Hirshfeld; Beverly H Lorell; Geno Merli; George P Rodgers; Cynthia M Tracy; Howard H Weitz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  All-cause readmission and repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention in a cohort of medicare patients.

Authors:  Jeptha P Curtis; Geoffrey Schreiner; Yongfei Wang; Jersey Chen; John A Spertus; John S Rumsfeld; Ralph G Brindis; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators.

Authors:  M E Farkouh; P A Smars; G S Reeder; A R Zinsmeister; R W Evans; T D Meloy; S L Kopecky; M Allen; T G Allison; R J Gibbons; S E Gabriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging determination of cardiac prognosis.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; Timothy M Morgan; Christina M Neagle; Craig A Hamilton; Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat; Kerry M Link
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Costs of an emergency department-based accelerated diagnostic protocol vs hospitalization in patients with chest pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R R Roberts; R J Zalenski; E K Mensah; R J Rydman; G Ciavarella; L Gussow; K Das; L M Kampe; B Dickover; M F McDermott; A Hart; H E Straus; D G Murphy; R Rao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with observation unit care reduces cost for patients with emergent chest pain: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Chadwick D Miller; Wenke Hwang; James W Hoekstra; Doug Case; Cedric Lefebvre; Howard Blumstein; Brian Hiestand; Deborah B Diercks; Craig A Hamilton; Erin N Harper; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain.

Authors:  W Patricia Ingkanisorn; Raymond Y Kwong; Nicole S Bohme; Nancy L Geller; Kenneth L Rhoads; Christopher K Dyke; D Ian Paterson; Mushabbar A Syed; Anthony H Aletras; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Effect of exercise treadmill testing and stress imaging on the triage of patients with chest pain: CHEER substudy.

Authors:  Gautam Ramakrishna; James J Milavetz; Alan R Zinsmeister; Michael E Farkouh; Roger W Evans; Thomas G Allison; Peter A Smars; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.616

  10 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Chest pain: coronary CT in the ER.

Authors:  Erica Maffei; Sara Seitun; Andrea I Guaricci; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Role of Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Suspected Ischemia but No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Sawan Jalnapurkar; Parham Zarrini; Puja K Mehta; Louise E J Thomson; Megha Agarwal; Bruce A Samuels; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Jo-Ann Eastwood; Daniel Berman; Noel Bairey Merz; Margo B Minissian
Journal:  J Radiol Nurs       Date:  2017-08-30

Review 3.  Noninvasive cardiac imaging in suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; S Richard Underwood; Roxy Senior; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Imaging techniques for the assessment of suspected acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Devang M Dave; Maros Ferencic; Udo Hoffmann; James E Udelson
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.200

Review 5.  Emergency department observation units and the older patient.

Authors:  Mark G Moseley; Miles P Hawley; Jeffrey M Caterino
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 6.  Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: targeted imaging to refine upstream risk stratification.

Authors:  Henry Chang; James K Min; Sunil V Rao; Manesh R Patel; Orlando P Simonetti; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Provider-directed imaging stress testing reduces health care expenditures in lower-risk chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department.

Authors:  Chadwick D Miller; James W Hoekstra; Cedric Lefebvre; Howard Blumstein; Craig A Hamilton; Erin N Harper; Simon Mahler; Deborah B Diercks; Rebecca Neiberg; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Robert F Riley; Brian C Hiestand; Gregory B Russell; James W Hoekstra; Cedric W Lefebvre; Bret A Nicks; David M Cline; Kim L Askew; Stephanie B Elliott; David M Herrington; Gregory L Burke; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-03

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Doesch; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

10.  Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 as a Predictor of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients Receiving Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Simon A Mahler; Thomas C Register; Robert F Riley; Ralph B D'Agostino; Jason P Stopyra; Chadwick D Miller
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.