Literature DB >> 21830250

Teasing apart tangrams: testing hippocampal pattern separation with a collaborative referencing paradigm.

Melissa C Duff1, David E Warren, Rupa Gupta, Juan Pablo Benabe Vidal, Daniel Tranel, Neal J Cohen.   

Abstract

The hippocampus and the medial temporal lobe cortex [medial temporal lobe cortices (MTLC)] both contribute to long-term memory. Although their contributions are thought to be dissociable, the nature of the representations that each region supports remains unclear. The Complementary Learning Systems (CLS) modeling approach suggests that hippocampus represents overlapping information in a sparser and therefore more separated fashion than MTLC. We tested this prediction using a collaborative referencing paradigm whereby hippocampal amnesic patients and a partner work together to develop and use unique labels for a set of abstract visual stimuli (tangrams) across extended interactions. Previously, we reported that amnesic patients demonstrate intact learning when the tangrams are conceptually dissimilar. Here, we manipulated the degree of visual similarity; half of the stimuli were dissimilar to one another (e.g., camel and giraffe), and half were similar (e.g., birds). We hypothesized that while patients would have little difficulty with the dissimiliar tangrams (quickly arriving at unique and concise labels), they would be unable to rapidly form distinct representations of highly similar visual patterns. Consistent with this prediction, patients and both healthy and brain-damaged comparison participants showed similar rates of learning for dissimilar tangrams, but the similar tangrams proved more difficult for hippocampal patients as reflected in the greater number of words they used to describe each similar card. This result supports the CLS model's central claim of hippocampal specialization for pattern separation and suggests that our collaborative referencing paradigm may be a useful tool for observing extended encoding of complex representations.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830250      PMCID: PMC3472641          DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  25 in total

1.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Components of recognition memory: dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity?

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 3.  The contribution of the human medial temporal lobe to perception: bridging the gap between animal and human studies.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Morgan D Barense; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2005 Jul-Oct

4.  When memory does not fail: familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Carmen E Westerberg; Ken A Paller; Sandra Weintraub; M-Marsel Mesulam; Juliet S Holdstock; Andrew R Mayes; Paul J Reber
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 5.  Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis.

Authors:  J P Aggleton; M W Brown
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: revisiting the complementary learning systems model.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Perceptual deficits in amnesia: challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Tim J Bussey; Elisabeth A Murray; Lisa M Saksida; Russell A Epstein; Narinder Kapur; John R Hodges; Kim S Graham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Yes/no recognition, forced-choice recognition, and the human hippocampus.

Authors:  P J Bayley; J T Wixted; R O Hopkins; L R Squire
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?

Authors:  J S Holdstock; A R Mayes; N Roberts; E Cezayirli; C L Isaac; R C O'Reilly; K A Norman
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Abnormal categorization and perceptual learning in patients with hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Kim S Graham; Victoria L Scahill; Michael Hornberger; Morgan D Barense; Andy C H Lee; Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  5 in total

1.  Pattern separation deficits following damage to the hippocampus.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; Andrew Hartshorn; Shauna M Stark; Naomi J Goodrich-Hunsaker; Ramona O Hopkins; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Age-related changes in place learning for adjacent and separate locations.

Authors:  Enrique I Gracian; Laura E Shelley; Andrea M Morris; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Multivariate pattern analysis of the human medial temporal lobe revealed representationally categorical cortex and representationally agnostic hippocampus.

Authors:  Derek J Huffman; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.899

4.  Audience design through social interaction during group discussion.

Authors:  Shane L Rogers; Nicolas Fay; Murray Maybery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Impaired Behavioral Pattern Separation in Refractory Temporal Lobe Epilepsy and Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Sanam J Lalani; Anny Reyes; Erik Kaestner; Shauna M Stark; Craig E L Stark; David Lee; Leena Kansal; Jerry J Shih; Christine N Smith; Brianna M Paul; Carrie R McDonald
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.114

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.