Clifford B Jones1, Debra L Sietsema. 1. Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, Michigan State University, 230 Michigan Street NE, Suite 300, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA. Clifford.Jones@oamichigan.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Operative indications for displaced scapular fractures have been controversial and inconsistent. Surgeons have been dissuaded to operate on these uncommon fractures because of the complex anatomy, approaches, and fracture patterns. It is unclear whether return to work, pain, or complications differ in patients with scapular fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore assessed differences in rates of union, range of motion, ability to return to work, pain, and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular body and neck fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 182 patients with 182 scapular fractures treated between 2002 and 2005. Of the 182 fractures, 31 were treated with open reduction internal fixation and matched by age, occupation, and gender to 31 patients treated nonoperatively. The proportions of AO/OTA fracture types were similar in the two groups. The mean displacement, shortening, and angulation were greater in the operative group as compared with the nonoperative group. All patients were followed until healing or discharge from care (average, 1.5 years; range, 14-32 months). We assessed complications, return to work, and radiographic healing. RESULTS: All fractures healed. We found no differences in return to work, pain, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest operative treatment of displaced scapula fractures results in similar healing, return to work, pain, and complications as nonoperative treatment. We do not recommend operating on any scapular neck or body fractures displaced less than 20 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: Operative indications for displaced scapular fractures have been controversial and inconsistent. Surgeons have been dissuaded to operate on these uncommon fractures because of the complex anatomy, approaches, and fracture patterns. It is unclear whether return to work, pain, or complications differ in patients with scapular fractures treated nonoperatively or operatively. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore assessed differences in rates of union, range of motion, ability to return to work, pain, and complications between operatively and nonoperatively treated scapular body and neck fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 182 patients with 182 scapular fractures treated between 2002 and 2005. Of the 182 fractures, 31 were treated with open reduction internal fixation and matched by age, occupation, and gender to 31 patients treated nonoperatively. The proportions of AO/OTA fracture types were similar in the two groups. The mean displacement, shortening, and angulation were greater in the operative group as compared with the nonoperative group. All patients were followed until healing or discharge from care (average, 1.5 years; range, 14-32 months). We assessed complications, return to work, and radiographic healing. RESULTS: All fractures healed. We found no differences in return to work, pain, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations suggest operative treatment of displaced scapula fractures results in similar healing, return to work, pain, and complications as nonoperative treatment. We do not recommend operating on any scapular neck or body fractures displaced less than 20 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Authors: J L Marsh; Theddy F Slongo; Julie Agel; J Scott Broderick; William Creevey; Thomas A DeCoster; Laura Prokuski; Michael S Sirkin; Bruce Ziran; Brad Henley; Laurent Audigé Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2007 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Clifford B Jones; Jonathan P Cornelius; Debra L Sietsema; James R Ringler; Terrence J Endres Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Anil K Gupta; Brian Forsythe; Andrew S Lee; Joshua D Harris; Frank McCormick; Geoffrey D Abrams; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Nozomu Inoue; Brian J Cole Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 6.202